Meerut lab (Gupta, Balyan, Rustgi)
80 wheat EST-SSRs, not in the Sorrells set of Uni-EST-SSRs.

BI480021      BG908791        BI479738        BG313284        BG274953
BG909793      BG908790        BI479767        BG313511        BI479950 
BG909784      BG908612        BG604521        BI479770        BI479196 
BG909764      BG908603        BG605288        BI479809        BG604599
BG909482      BG909459        BG605310        BG604260        BI479801 
BG909325      BI479713        BG606122        BG605394        BG606384
BG909030      BI479118        BG604565        BG262529        BI479561 
BG908985      BI479123        BG604672        BG262603        BG263001
BG909152      BI479585        BG604688        Bg262485        BI480562 
BG908960      BI479751        BG604694        BG274944        BG262903
BG908922      BI479884        BG604714        BG262868        BG604899 
BG908890      BI479902        BG604731        Bg262880        BG605148 
BG908909      BI480011        BG604862        BG262892        
BG908875      BG604939        BG262944        BG605404 
BG908846      BI479142        BG604973        BG262964 
BG908818      BI479580        BG605043        BG313609
BG908816      BI479694        BG605005        BG313615

======
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 
From: Sachin Rustgi <rustgi2001@yahoo.com>

The 80 unique sequences deposited by our group are
unique to each other and I have also explored the
possibility, which you have indicated in your mail
that these sequences may represent non aligning parts
of a single gene by manually viewing the members of
each contig corresponding to our 80 unique sequences
at TIGR site (consensus sequences for the above 80
ESTs are also available at this site). Not a single
sequence is represented in two different contigs. I
have also used tBLASTx to ensure that non of the above
EST correspond to the same protein counterpart.