Nomenclature proposal
Locus: "W"+ContigNumber_ContigIssueNumber_TestNumber_published EMBL
or GenBank accession_BasePosn
Allele: as Locus_A or Locus_C or Locus_G or Locus_T
Example: Contig 1090, from the first set of contigs issued, the
first SNP test designed, corresponds to sequence U76558 in the EMBL
database, the variant base corresponds to position 479 in this
sequence.
W1090_01_001_U76558_479 for the locus
for which W1090_01_001_U76558_479_A and W1090_01_001_U76558_479_T
are the known alleles.
This is self-evidently unwieldy. Perhaps an alternative would be to
put the EMBL accession number first, delete references to the
contigs, so it becomes
U76558_479 for the locus and U76558_479_A and U76558_479_T for the alleles.
The cognate gene or family could also be appended eg. U76558_479_T
(alpha tubulin). This at least has some biological relevance.
Problem: what do we do when there is no homologous wheat sequence
submitted to GenBank or EMBL?
Return to Wheat SNP homepage