17th
North American Barley Researchers Workshop (NABRW)
September
22-25, 2002
Ramada
Plaza Suites and Conference Center
Fargo,
North Dakota, USA
Richard Horsley, Co-Chair
Michael Edwards, Co-Chair
Paul Schwarz
Lynn Dahleen
Marcia McMullen
Stephen Neate
Jerome Franckowiak
North Dakota Barley Council
Bayer Crop Science
Miller Brewing Co
NDSU Department of Plant
Sciences
North Dakota Crop
Improvement & Seed Association
Busch Agricultural
Resources, Inc.
NDSU College of Agriculture
American Malting Barley
Association
Sierra Nevada Brewing Co.,
Inc.
NDSU Agricultural Experiment
Station
Rahr Malting Co.
Cargill Incorporated
Blackwell Publishing
Summit Brewing Co.
NDSU Department of Cereal
and Food Sciences
BASF
Briess Malting Co
NDSU Department of Plant
Pathology
Syngenta Crop Protection
USDA-Agricultural Research
Service
Special
thanks to Kenneth Lamb, NDSU Plant Sciences, for preparing and updating the
NABRW web site; and to all of the NDSU
and ARS staff for their assistance, especially Melissa Welter, Eileen
Buringrud, Polly McMichael, and Lyle Lindberg.
17th
North American Barley Researchers Workshop
September
22-25, 2002
Fargo,
North Dakota, USA
8:00 am – Welcome
Feed, Food
and Malt Quality, Paul Schwarz, Moderator
8:10 Gary Hanning, Anheuser Busch – Malting barley quality needs.
8:50 Willie Rahr, Rahr Malting – Globalization of malting and
brewing.
9:20 Vern Anderson and Greg Lardy, North Dakota State University –
Feed barley research and market
development. p. 7.
9:40-10:00 Break
10:00 Walt Newman, Montana State University – Barley dietary fiber and
beta-glucans: pigs and people. p. 7.
10:20 Christine Fastnaught, National. Barley Foods Council – Barley
reduces cholesterol – an update on
clinical trials and FDA petition process. p. 8.
10:40 Dennis Gordon, North Dakota State University – Barley as a human
food and functional food. p. 8.
11:10 Jorge Correa, Semillas Correa Mexicana – Barley and its potential
as a forage crop in dairy production
in Mexico. p. 9.
11:30 Discussion
12:00-1:15 Lunch
1:15-3:30 Joint AMBA liaison meeting/poster
session
3:30-4:00 Break
4:00-5:30 Guided beer tasting
7:00-10:00 Canadian
Researchers/Barley Development Council Meeting
8:30 Stephen Neate, North Dakota State University –Root disease
suppression in small grains in a
low rainfall and low soil fertility environment. p. 9.
9:00 Brian Steffenson, University of
Minnesota – Host-Parasite Genetics in the Hordeum vulgare:Cochliobolus sativus
pathosystem. p. 10.
9:30 Henriette Horvath, Washington State University - Genetically engineered stem rust resistance in barley using the Rpg1
gene. p. 10
9:50-10:15 Break
10:15 Kelly Turkington, Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB – Barley production
and the impact of seedbed
utilization, row spacing, and fungicide. p. 11.
10:35 Rich Horsley, North Dakota State University – Efficacy of
fungicides for controlling FHB in
barley genotypes with partial resistance. p. 11.
11:00-12:00 Business meeting/poster
session
12-1:15 Lunch
1:30 Darrell Wesenberg, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Aberdeen,
ID – History of barley research at the
Aberdeen Station. p. 12.
2:10 Steve Ullrich, Washington State University –Principles learned
about quantitative traits in barley from
QTL analysis. p. 12.
2:30 Mario Therrien, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, MB
– Digital plant breeding. p. 17.
2:50-3:10 Break
3:10 Blake Cooper, Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc. - Breeding for
lower DON response in six-row
malting barley using conventional methods and existing germplasm. p. 17.
3:30 Victoria Carollo, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA
- GrainGenes and other public databases
for barley genomics. p. 18.
4:00-5:00 Poster session
6:30-7:30 Social
7:30-10:00 Banquet – Dinner Speaker, Mark Peihl, Archivist,
Clay Co. Historical Society Presentation
“Fargo-Beerhead”
8:00-9:00 Poster session
9:00 Andy Kleinhofs, Washington State University – Genetic and
physical mapping towards map-based
cloning in barley. p. 18.
9:40 Tim Close, University of California, Riverside – HarvEST
Triticeae: a portable EST database
viewer for barley researchers and others. p. 19.
10:20-10:40 Break
10:40 Warren Kruger, University of Minnesota – Using EST databases for
functional and comparative
bioinformatics. p. 19.
11:20 Roger Wise, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA –
Parallel expression analysis using
barley microarrays. p. 20.
Farewell
Wednesday pm – Campus and lab
tours
Poster
Presentations
1. Effectiveness
of in Vitro Selection in Barley for Fusarium Head Blight
Resistance. M. Banik, W.G. Legge, B.
Bizimungu, J. Tucker, M.C. Therrien, A. Tekauz, F. Edes and M. Savard. p. 20.
2. Characterization of the Barley Stem
Rust Resistance Gene Rpg1 Family.
R. Brueggeman, N. Rostoks, D. Kudrna, A. Druka, and
A. Kleinhofs. p. 21.
3. Multivariate Analysis of Malting
Quality. Allen D. Budde, Lauri
Herrin and Berne L. Jones. p. 21
4. Breeding BYDV Resistant Barley with
an Agronomically Improved Background. Flavio
Capettini, Monique Henry and Hugo Vivar. p. 22.
5. GrainGenes:
The Triticeae Genome Database. Victoria Carollo, David
Matthews, Gerard Lazo, and Olin Anderson. p. 22.
6.
A Proposal for the Use of Pedigree and Historical Data for Marker Trait
Association in Barley. Federico
Condon, Kevin P. Smith
and Brian Steffenson. p. 23.
7. Evaluation of Bowman
Backcross-derived Barley Genetic Stocks. Jerome D. Franckowiak and An Hang.
p. 23.
8.
Evaluation of Hulless Barley Germplasm at Aberdeen, ID. A. Hang, K. Satterfield,
and C. S. Burton. p. 24.
9. A New
Look at Location Yield Data. James H. Helm, Patricia
Juskiw and Tim Duggan. p. 24.
10. The Stability of Diastatic Power QTL Expression in
Western Six-rowed Barley Backgrounds and Environments: The Initial Phases. David Hoffman and An Hang. p. 25.
11. Non-Starch Polysaccharides in Barley. M. S. Izydorczyk and S. Bazin. p. 25.
12. Proteinases and Proteinase Inhibitors of Barley and
Malt. Berne L. Jones. p. 26.
13. Fast Neutron Induced Barley Mutants. Kleinhofs, A., And Kudrna,
D. P. 26.
14. Spike Morphology and FHB Reaction In Barley. Nadejda
Krasheninnik and Jerome D. Franckowiak. p. 27.
15. Mapping Genes Conferring
Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in C93-3230-24. K.E. Lamb,
M.J. Green, R.D. Horsley, and Zhang Bingxing. p. 27.
16. Transformation of Barley cv. Conlon with Genes for
Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight. M. Manoharan, L.S. Dahleen, T.
Hohn, S.P. McCormick, N.A. Alexander, P. Schwarz, S. Neate and R.D.
Horsley. p. 28.
17. Using the Re-steep
Function for Hydrating Grain in the Joe White Micromalter. Christopher H. Martens, Allen D. Budde and Berne L.
Jones. p. 28.
18. Fungicide Application Timings of Folicur and AMS 21619
for Fusarium Head Blight Control in Six-Row and Two-Row Malting Barley. Kent McKay and Kristie
Clark. p. 29.
19. Fungicide Studies for Control of Fusarium Head Blight of Barley in
North Dakota, 1998-2002. McMullen, M., Meyer, S., Jordahl, J., Pederson, J., and Halley, S. p. 29.
20. Mapping Of
QTL Associated With Nitrogen Storage And Remobilization In Barley (Hordeum
vulgare L.) Leaves. Suzanne Mickelson, Deven See,
Fletcher D. Meyer,
John P. Garner, Curt R. Foster, Tom K. Blake and
Andreas M. Fischer. p. 30.
21. Status Of RWA-Resistant Barley Germplasm. D.W.
Mornhinweg, P.P. Bregitzer, Darrell Wesenberg, Bob Hammon, and Frank Peairs. p.
30.
22. Evaluation Of Near-Isogenic Lines For Fusarium
Head Blight Resistance QTL In Barley. L. M. Nduulu, A. Mesfin, G. J. Muehlbauer, and K. P. Smith.
p. 31.
23. Predicting Relative Maturity in Barley Using Spikes.
Joseph Nyachiro, James Helm, Patricia Juskiw, Donald
Salmon, Kequan Xi and Jennifer Zantinge. p. 31.
24. Potential NIRS Application for Plant Breeding & Production
Research. Lori Oatway and Jim Helm. p. 32.
25. Analysis of the Barley Stem Rust Resistance Gene Rpg1 Messenger RNA. Nils Rostoks, Brian Steffenson, David Kudrna, and Andris Kleinhofs. p. 32.
26. Genetic
Linkage Map of cv. Foster x Fusarium Resistant Line CI4196.
Deric Schmierer, David
Kudrna, Thomas Drade, and Andris Kleinhofs. p. 33.
27. Can Molecular Breeding Overcome Yield Ceilings in Western Two-Row
Malting Barley? D.A. Schmierer, A. Kleinhofs,
S.E. Ullrich, D.A. Kudrna, V.A. Jitkov, and B.L. Jones. p. 34.
28. Effects
Of Deoxynivalenol On Detached Barley Leaf Segments. Seeland, T.M., Bushnell,
W.R., and D.E. Krueger. p. 33.
29.
Evaluation Of The National Small Grains Collection Of Barley For Resistance To
Fusarium Head Blight And Deoxynivalenol Accumulation. L.G. Skoglund and J.L. Menert.
p. 37.
30. Reactions of
Barley Cultivars to Fusarium Head Blight (Fusarium graminearum) in
Western Canada. J. R. Tucker, W. G.
Legge, M. Savard, M. C. Therrien, A. Tekauz, B. G. Rossnagel, B. L. Harvey, E.
Lefol, D. Voth and T. Zatorski. p. 37.
31. An Alberta Perspective On Fusarium Head Blight. T.K.
Turkington, R.M. Clear, J. Calpas, and J.P. Tewari. p. 38.
32. Summary of QTL Analyses of the Seed Dormancy Trait
in Barley. S.E. Ullrich, F. Han, W. Gao, D. Prada, J. Clancy, A. Kleinhofs, I.
Romagosa, and J.L. Molina-Cano. p. 39.
33. Mapping Quantitative Stripe Rust Resistance in a Large Doubled
Haploid Population of Barley. Vales, M. Isabel; Hayes, Patrick M; Castro, Ariel;
Corey, Ann; Mundt, Chris; Capettini, Flavio; Vivar, Hugo; Sandoval-Islas,
Sergio; and Schoen, Chris. p. 38.
34. Phenotypic
Associative Microsatellite (SSR) Marker Assisted Selection. L. J. Wright, D. B. Cooper, and P.
Hayes. p. 42.
35. Cultivar Resistance To Scald Of Barley In Alberta From 1997 To
2001. K. Xi, T.K. Turkington, M. Cortez, J. Helm, P. Juskiw and
J. Nyachiro. p. 42.
36. Genetic
Structure of Rhynchosporium secalis in Alberta. J.
Zantinge, J. Hillson and K. Xi. p. 43.
Feed
Barley Research and Market Development.
Greg Lardy and Vern Anderson, North Dakota State
University, Fargo and Carrington.
Feed barley is economically and nutritionally
competitive with other grains and co-products available in the Northern Plains
states and provinces. Feed barley is
commonly used in diets for ruminant and non-ruminant species, with beef cattle
feeding providing the largest market. Developing specific feed barley cultivars
could enhance the value and improve animal performance from feeding
barley. Selection priorities include
reduced starch fermentation rate, increased fiber digestibility, hulless
varieties, higher protein levels, and yield.
A Western Coordinating Committee (WCC-201) is composed of university
faculty in all barley growing states and functions to increase communications among researchers, educate feed barley
users, and identify research needs.
NDSU feed barley research efforts focus on beef and bison feeding
trials. Sprouting did not adversely
affect feed value of barley and coarse rolling of sprouted barley improved
feedlot performance. Tempering barley
increased feed efficiency and adding a yeast/enzyme cocktail reduced effects of
weather stress on feedlot performance.
Particle size of processed barley did not affect animal performance in
corn gluten diets. Barley
supplementation up to .8% of body weight in forage fed beef cows increased diet
digestibility but higher levels reduced intake and digestibility. Bison fed high starch (67% barley) diets
gained faster than high digestible fiber levels (soy hulls). North Dakota State University is expanding
beef feedlot research with several trials planned that include barley. The North Dakota Barley Council has hired a
“Barley Utilization Development Specialist” to promote and educate potential
barley users worldwide. Substantial
barley feeding information is available in the region from university and other
resources.
Vern Anderson, vanderso@ndsuext.nodak.edu,
701.652.2951
Barley
dietary fiber and β-glucans: Pigs
and people. C. Walt
Newman and Rosemary K. Newman, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717.
Although
vastly different in physical appearance, the digestive and metabolic systems of
the two species are remarkably similar.
Recent studies have shown the health benefits of barley dietary fiber
(DF) and β-glucans (βG) for humans.
Most reports concern the positive modification of serum lipids, serum
glucose, and/or insulin levels. Blood
lipids and glycemic effects are not generally considered as important as the
available energy of a foodstuff for pigs.
Because of the higher DF in barley, which contributes only a negligible
amount of energy, barley is generally thought to be inferior to grains such as
maize for growing pigs. However, an
extensive cooperative study showed that barley was comparable to maize as a
foodstuff for young pigs. More recently
a study was conducted to evaluate barley DF and βG levels in diets of baby
pigs. Diets were fed containing two
levels of βG (5 and 7%) and three levels of DF (19, 22, and 26%). Growth of the pigs tended to increase with
increasing levels of DF, especially those fed the 5% βG diets. Historical anecdotal reports indicate the
benefits of barley products for human infants such as barley water. Thus it is likely that the results from the
baby pig study support such claims, and suggest a beneficial and therapeutic
value of barley, dietary fiber and βG.
C. Walt
Newman, cwn@montana.com, 406.686.4606
Barley Reduces Cholesterol – An Update on Clinical Trials and FDA Petition Process. Christine Fastnaught, National Barley Foods Council (Consultant),
Judith Hallfrisch and Kay Behall, USDA-ARS, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center.
The Barley Foods Research Steering Committee was established in 1999 at the request of the National Barley Foods Council. The Committee,
comprised of barley producers, industry, and scientists, was asked to review existing health research and identify new research priorities on behalf of the US
food barley industry. A proposal ‘BARLEY FOODS HEALTH BENEFITS RESEARCH PROJECT’ was submitted to the National Barley Improvement Committee.
As a result, congress approved significant new funding for health research involving barley. Two clinical trials have been completed to date. For both trials, a
Midwestern barley containing at least 4% beta-glucan was processed by pearling and subsequent flaking and grinding/sieving. Pearled barley, flakes and flour
were incorporated into recipes so that subjects consumed 0, 3g, or 6g beta-glucan soluble fiber/day in a double-blind, five week crossover study. The control (0)
consisted of brown rice/whole wheat. In study 1 (2001), participants were 18 non-hypertensive men with moderately elevated cholesterol levels and in study 2
(2002), both men and women participated. All participants consumed a NCEP step 1 diet for 2 weeks prior to the first intervention period. In study 1,
blood pressure was reduced by all of the whole grain diets compared to baseline or the step 1 diet. Total cholesterol was significantly lower (14%, 17% and 20%,
respectively) while HDL cholesterol was higher (9%, 7% and 18%) after the low, mid and high soluble fiber diets compared to pre-study values. While results from
study 2 have not been compiled, consumption of barley appears to be as effective as oats in improving risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Christine Fastnaught, cefastnaught@msn.com, 701-293-5146
Barley as
a Human Food and Functional Food. Dennis T. Gordon, Dept of Cereal Science, North Dakota State
University, Fargo, ND, 58105
Barley is one of eight common
cereals. Common varieties include six-row and two-row, with or without hull,
and all can be pearled. Pearled barley has the highest potential for use as a
human food or food ingredient. The hull and/or bran of barley are not as
acceptable, compared to wheat bran, for use in “bran” or “dietary fiber” foods.
The common remark that barley has an unacceptable taste or flavor is without
merit; Gerber’s Barley Cereal is well accepted by mothers and babies. Barley
has a nutritional profile that compares favorably to oats, but it suffers that
oats were popularized first. There is little demand for barley as a human food,
which is unfortunate. This can be partially attributed to the high marketing
costs to develop and sustain a “brand” product. One unique functional food
ingredient in barley and associated with human health is β-glucan.
β-glucan has been shown to lower blood cholesterol in humans and is
extensively investigated for its potential to attenuate blood glucose levels.
SustagrainTM is a new variety of barley (Prowashonupana) and has
approximately twice the amount of β-glucan compared to conventional barley
varieties and oats. The CSIRO laboratories in Australia are investing a barley
variety (CSIRO-Barley) with high resistant starch content. Resistant starch has
the physiological properties of dietary fiber and a prebiotic. Prebiotics
stimulate the growth of lactic acid producing bacteria in the large intestine,
which helps promote intestinal health. Barley also contains arabinoxylans which
stimulate intestinal peristalsis because of their water hold capacity. The
combined physiological effects and biochemical reactions resulting from the
intestinal fermentation of β-glucan, arabinoxylans and resistant starch in
barley can make it an attractive functional food for health. All cereals,
including barley, can provide significant amounts of phenolic compounds,
another important class of functional food ingredients.
Dennis T.
Gordon; dennis.gordon@ndsu.nodak.edu; 701-231-9438
The
development of the Mexican dairy industry created a great increase in demand of
high quality forage, during the summer-spring as well as in fall-winter
seasons. The 10-year drought in Mexico has generated the need to produce forage
for the short-term demand and in highly technified areas such as in Laguna,
Northern Mexico. It is important to mention that this demand has also brought
the need to grow forage in two cycles during fall and winter, including oat,
wheat, triticale and more recently, barley. Semillas Correa Mexicana, a
national seed producing company, has been working intensively in the last two
years (two cycles per season) in order to obtain new varieties of oat,
triticale and awnless barley. It is important to underline that during
fall-winter, barley results were superior to all other crops, exceeding the
expected. Therefore, we will focus our presentation in the results obtained in
three different states in México, and will also see the future importance that
barley will play in our country.
Jorge A.
Correa, semillas@scorrea.com, (01461)
61 15135
Traditionally, ecological research into
mechanisms which lead to disease suppressive soils has involved study of
interactions between the pathogen and only one or a few microorganisms or
physical or chemical factors in the soil.
As the temporal and spatial growth of a pathogenic organism is
influenced by ongoing interactions with different trophic groups of soil biota
we propose that an ecological approach may be better suited to understand the
mechanisms behind the development of a disease suppressive soil. We systematically tested the effect on
disease of the potential factors that influence the survival of disease
inoculum, both within and between seasons.
The often transient nature of the interactions we detected confirmed the
need for a sequential sampling approach.
Spatial variations also required that that factor be taken into account
when taking measurements. The complex biotic interactions measured confirmed
the need for an integrated ecological approach i.e. combination of functional
and trophic groups, and utilizing the food-web model. We compare the results we obtained in a low rainfall low soil
fertility environment with other mechanistic studies of suppression in higher
rainfall and higher fertility environments.
Stephen M. Neate, stephen.neate@ndsu.nodak.edu;
701 231-7078
Host-Parasite Genetics in the Hordeum
vulgare:Cochliobolus sativus pathosystem. Brian Steffenson and Shaobin Zhong, Department of
Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Spot
blotch, caused by Cochliobolus sativus,
is an important disease of barley in the United States. Six-rowed malting cultivars in the upper
Midwest possess durable resistance to spot blotch, which was derived from the
breeding line ND B112. Genetic analysis
of six-rowed barley cultivars revealed that spot blotch resistance at the
seedling stage is conferred by a single major gene (Rcs5) on chromosome 1(7H).
Durable adult plant resistance in the field is controlled by two
quantitative trait loci: one on
chromosome 5(1H) explaining 63% of the phenotypic variance and a second one on
chromosome 1(7H) explaining 9% of the variance. Three pathotypes (0, 1, and 2) of C. sativus were
identified on three differential barley genotypes. A cross was made between the pathotype 2 isolate ND90Pr and the
pathotype 0 isolate ND93-1. Virulence
on cultivar Bowman was controlled by a single locus (VHv1) in isolate ND90Pr. A
genetic map of the ND90Pr/ND93-1 cross was constructed using molecular markers,
and six co-segregating AFLP markers were identified for VHv1 on one of the major linkage groups. Fifteen chromosomes were resolved from CHEF gel electrophoresis
of C. sativus isolates ND90Pr and ND93-1. Hybridization of CHEF-separated DNA with a cloned AFLP marker
co-segregating with VHv1 localized
the barley virulence locus to a well-separated chromosome of 2.8 Mbp. Research is underway to clone both Rcs5 in barley and VHv1 in C. sativus. The successful cloning of these genes will allow us to develop a
model system for studying host-parasite interactions at the molecular level.
Brian
Steffenson, bsteffen@umn.edu, (612)
625-4735
Genetically
engineered stem rust resistance in barley using the Rpg1 gene. Horvath,
H., Rostoks, N., Brueggeman, R., Steffenson, B., von Wettstein, D. and
Kleinhofs, A. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, School of Molecular
Biosciences, Washington State University.
Stem rust,
caused by Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, was among the most
devastating diseases of barley in the northern Great Plains of the U.S.
and Canada before the deployment of the stem rust-resistance gene Rpg1
in the 1940s. Since then, Rpg1 has provided durable
protection against severe stem rust losses, except for a few minor outbreaks.
Recently, the Rpg1 gene was cloned by a map-based approach. Sequencing
of Rpg1 alleles revealed a functional gene structure only in resistant
cultivars and a defective gene structure or lack of Rpg1 in susceptible
cultivars. Here we present the first case of stable transformation of a
susceptible cultivar with a cloned barley disease resistance gene. Using
Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, the Rpg1 gene isolated
from cv. Morex (including 864 bp upstream of the start codon and 651 bp
downstream of the stop codon) was transferred into the susceptible cultivar
Golden Promise. Forty-two transgenic T0 plants containing the stem
rust resistance gene were obtained. The T1 generation of 12
transformants was analyzed for resistance to stem rust pathotype MCC. Resistance
was observed in 10 transgenic barley lines, while two lines gave rise to
susceptible progeny. Interestingly, the majority of transgenic stem rust
resistant plants exhibited a level of resistance that was higher than Morex,
the original source of the cloned resistance gene. The reason for this apparent
anomaly as well as stability of transgenic plants is being investigated.
Henriette
Horvath, PhD, henny@mail.wsu.edu,
509-335-5933
Barley production and the impact of seedbed
utilization, row spacing, and fungicide. T.K. Turkington1
, H.R. Kutcher2, G.W. Clayton1, J.D. O'Donovan3,
A.M. Johnston4, K.N. Harker1, J.H. Helm5, and
F.C. Stevenson6. 1Lacombe Res. Centre, Agric. and Agri-Food Canada
(AAFC), Lacombe, AB, Canada; 2Melfort
Research Farm, AAFC, Melfort, SK, Canada;
3Beaverlodge Res. Farm, AAFC, Beaverlodge, AB, Canada; 3Potash and Phosphate Institute
of Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada; 5Field
Crop Dev. Centre, Alberta Agric., Food and Rural Dev., Lacombe, AB,
Canada; 6142 Rogers Rd.,
Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Seeding
systems that have openers spreading seed rather than placing it in distinct
rows may enhance foliar cereal disease pressure by restricting canopy air
movement, thus producing favourable microenvironmental conditions. In addition, narrow row spacing may also
enhance disease development and negatively impact productivity. A field experiment was conducted at Lacombe
and Beaverlodge, AB, and Melfort, SK, from 1999 to 2000 to evaluate the effect
of seedbed utilization (SBU) using three seed placements (distinct row: 23 cm
and 30 cm with a hoe opener; and spread band: a 20 cm spread using a 28 cm
sweep on 23 cm row spacing) and fungicide (propiconazole) applications
(untreated check, and applications at the 2–3 leaf stage, flag leaf stage,
heading stage, 2–3 leaf plus flag leaf stage, and flag leaf plus heading
stage). Net blotch severity and yield
varied with location and year, with disease highest and yields lowest for those
treatments that did not include a fungicide application at either the flag leaf
stage or heading. Foliar disease
severity and yield were influenced by the SBU treatments, but varied with
location and year, with a trend of higher disease and lower yields for the two
hoe opener treatments, which were similar. The increase in disease and
reduction in grain yield, when no fungicide was applied, tended to be smaller
for the spread band versus hoe treatments.
Planting in distinct rows may have resulted in higher disease and lower
yields by helping to facilitate spore dispersal and subsequent disease
development compared with the spread band treatment.
T.K.
Turkington, turkingtonk@agr.gc.ca, (403) 782-8138.
Efficacy of Fungicides in Controlling Barley Fusarim
Head Blight in Lines With Partial Resistance.
J.D. Pederson1, R.D.
Horsley1, M. McMullen2,3, and K. McKay3. 1Dep.
of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., 2Dep of Plant
Pathology, North Dakota State Univ.; and 3North Dakota Extension
Service.
Research to
test the efficacy of fungicides in controlling Fusarium head blight (FHB) and
deoxynivalenol (DON) levels in barley was previously conducted using cultivars
(i.e. Robust, Foster, and Stander) that are susceptible to FHB. Results indicate that fungicides had little
to no effect in reducing DON concentration to levels acceptable to the malting
and brewing industry. Minimal
information is available on the efficacy of fungicides in controlling FHB and
DON levels on genotypes with partial FHB resistance. The objective of this study is to determine if the integrated use
of fungicides and barley cultivars with partial resistance to FHB will control
FHB severity and accumulation of DON.
Experiments were conducted in the field in North Dakota since 2000 and
included genotypes resistant, partially resistant, and susceptible to FHB. Fungicides used were Folicur in 2000, 2001,
and 2002; and AMS21619 in 2001 and 2002.
Folicur did not significantly reduce FHB severity or DON accumulation in
resistant, moderately resistant, or susceptible genotypes. However, genotypes sprayed with Folicur
generally had greater yield due to control of septoria speckled leaf blotch
(SSLB), incited by Septoria passerinii.
Yield gains due to control of SSLB tended to be sufficient to cover the
cost of Folicur and its application on cultivars developed and released by
upper Midwest barley breeding programs.
Preliminary data indicates that efficacy of AMS21619 was slightly better
than Folicur in reducing FHB and DON.
R. Horsley, Richard.Horsley@ndsu.nodak.edu,
701-231-8142
A Historical Perspective on Barley Breeding and
Related Research at Aberdeen, Idaho. Darrell M. Wesenberg*, J. Michael
Bonman, and Donald E. Obert
USDA-ARS ret.* and USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, Idaho 83210
The
Aberdeen Research and Extension Center was established in 1911. Initially the Idaho Agricultural Experiment
Station and the USDA Office of Cereal Investigations jointly operated the
Center. Early objectives included the
improvement of cereals in the intermountain region by introducing better
varieties. Spring barley variety
testing began in 1912. Winter barley,
hulless barley, hooded, and beardless barley were studied. Composite cross populations were reported as
early as 1923. The first reference to
malting barley was the inclusion of ‘Canadian Malting No. 2’ in trials in
1925. Over time varieties resulted from
reselections from introduced varieties, variety introductions, selection from
composite crosses, and traditional pedigree breeding. G.A Wiebe played a key role in barley research at Aberdeen from
the early 1920s. With his appointment
as Junior Plant Breeder by the USDA in May 1922, he began a long career with
the USDA, culminating in the national role of USDA-ARS Barley Investigations
Leader. Other individuals who provided
the basis for barley breeding and research accomplishments at Aberdeen include
H.V. Harlan, M.L. Martini, Harland Stevens, Ralph Hayes, and Allen
Dickson. Varieties introduced or developed
and released at Aberdeen have been important commercial varieties as well as
being widely used parents that have contributed to other significant
varieties. Today basic project
objectives are similar, but goals are more diverse and although traditional
pedigree breeding remains an important approach, new breeding targets and new
technologies involving tissue culture, transgenic germplasm, and molecular
markers are creating greater opportunities for barley improvement.
D.M.
Wesenberg, dwesen4285@aol.com,
208-226-2638
Principles
Learned about Quantitative Traits in Barley from QTL Analysis.
Steven E.
Ullrich, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420
Quantitative
traits (QTs) have always been difficult to study and understand and have
greatly baffled geneticists. Conventional quantitative genetic analyses have
been unsatisfactory and unsatisfying in terms of actual usable knowledge
gained, and the assumptions underlying such analyses are generally unrealistic
and unacceptable. The following is a quote about QTs from a well known plant
breeding textbook published within the last decade: “Each multiple gene
expresses a small effect on the phenotype relative to the total variation;
normally it is not possible to identify individual gene effects.” Quantitative
trait locus (QTL) analysis using advanced molecular genetic and computer tools
has opened a floodgate of knowledge about quantitative traits not available
through conventional genetic analyses. The term QTL was invented to describe a
genetic determinant for a QT, which is not quite at the level of gene or locus
in the conventional sense. This paper is intended to be a reflection of
perspectives based on experience and observation.
Considerable
new and usable information has been gained over the past 10 years about
economically important QTs in barley starting with but not limited to QTL
analysis. Much of this information has been made possible through the North
American Barley Genome (Mapping) Project and based on key comprehensive
molecular maps. First of all, QTL analyses have identified the number and
approximate chromosome location of QTLs for many traits (7, 11, 12, 13, 16).
These results in themselves are very exciting and satisfying. QTL analyses have
given us the first real genetic glimpses of important QTs. In addition QTL
analysis has allowed for the calculation of QTL effects (r2 values
or % variation explained), heritability, and environmental (E) and QTL x E, and
QTL x QTL interaction effects.
QTLs that
map coincidently with other QTLs of other traits have confirmed relationships
among traits and have raised questions about the occurrence and role of
pleiotropy and gene clusters. For example, malt extract content QTLs usually
map coincidently with other QTLs, such as for a-amylase activity, diastatic power, malt b-glucanase
activity, and/or malt b-glucan
content, which are all sub-traits or contributing traits of malt extract (5, 18).
Grain yield QTLs often overlap with sub-trait QTLs, such as heading date, plant
height, lodging resistance, and/or shatter resistance (7, 12, 16). Fusarium
head blight resistance QTLs may overlap with QTLs for plant height and
inflorescence morphology (20). Chromosome regions that are rich in major
related QTLs are logical candidates for marker-assisted selection (MAS) for
trait maintenance or improvement in applied breeding.
QTL
analysis has opened the door for fine mapping, further genetic study, map-based
cloning, and MAS. Identified QTLs have been “isolated” by selection within
doubled haploid line (DHL) mapping populations or by marker-assisted backcross
isoline development. Such lines have been used for QTL verification and study
of gene action and epistasis, e.g., for seed dormancy (3, 4). Marker-assisted
selection has been used for QTL verification and for breeding applications.
Barley stripe rust (BSR) resistance QTLs were mapped (1) and the information
used for breeding BSR resistance cultivars (6,17). This involved a two
gene-plus model. Verification of QTLs via tests of MAS has met with mixed
results. Using DHLs form ‘Steptoe’/’Morex’ crosses not used in the mapping
efforts, a major malting quality QTL region on chromosome 1 (7H) was verified and
MAS improved malting quality compared with conventional phenotypic selection
(2). However, another QTL region on chromosome 4 seemed to disappear! A similar
study, using ‘Harrington’/TR306 DHLs not used in the mapping effort, produced
similar results. Two major malting quality QTL regions on chromosome 7 (5H)
were verified with MAS improving malting quality, but QTL regions on
chromosomes 3 and 6 could not be definitively confirmed (8). Moving a grain
yield QTL on chromosome 3 from Steptoe into Morex via MAS seemed not to
adversely affect malting quality of progeny, but did lower test weight and
apparently did not increase grain yield (10). Again, using a Steptoe/Morex DHL
population not used in mapping, confirmed with consistent positive MAS results
grain yield QTL regions on chromosome 3 and 6. MAS for chromosome 2 and 7 (5H)
yield QTLs gave inconsistent results due apparently to QTL x E interactions
(15). Introgressing three yield QTL regions from Steptoe into the Morex
background via MAS resulted in little effect on malting quality, improvements
in yield related traits (reduced plant height, lodging, shattering), but no
improvement on grain yield itself (9). On the other hand a MAS study involving
backcrossing ‘Baronesse’ grain yield QTLs into the Harrington background has
been preliminarily successful in the development of lines with Harrington-like
malting quality and Baronesse-like grain yield (Schmierer et al., 2002, this
proceedings). However, there is one backcross line that has improved yield and
reduced malting quality, and it does not contain any of the targeted Baronesse
yield QTLs!
Experience
in fine mapping studies using isolines developed by MAS backcrossing and in
various MAS breeding schemes for improving or maintaining complex “mega traits”,
such as malt extract and grain yield, indicates that the background genotype is
of great importance. It appears isogenic lines are not usually isogenic even
with the aid of molecular marker checks. Furthermore, behavior of QTLs is not
always as expected in different backgrounds. Ramage’s (14 ) concepts of the
role of background genotype and “happy homes” appear to be as important for
QTLs as they are for qualitative genes. Lack of ‘purity” of genetic background
also allows for epistatic effects not expected because of previously undetected
“genes”. The effects of E and QTL x E interactions also complicate
understanding. Crossover interactions in which a QTL expresses alternative
favorable alleles (19) are also perplexing and complicate MAS. However, refinement
of techniques and the ability to observe the genome more comprehensively, with
for example micro-arrays, will continue to advance our understanding of QTs.
But at present, even with QTL analysis and subsequent molecular genetic study,
QTs can still be baffling.
1. Chen, F.Q.
D. Prehn, P.M. Hayes, D. Mulrooney, A. Corey, and H. Vivar. 1994 Mapping genes
for resistance to barley stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f.sp. hordei).
Theor. Appl. Genet. 88:215-219.
2. Han, F.,
I. Romagosa, S.E. Ullrich, B. Jones, P.M. Hayes, and D.M. Wesenberg. 1997.
Molecular marker assisted selection for malting quality traits in barley.
Molec. Breed. 3:427-437.
3. Han, F.,
S.E. Ullrich, J.A.. Clancy, V. Jitkov, A. Kilian, and I. Romagosa. 1996.
Verification of barley seed dormancy loci via linked molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:87-91.
4. Han, F.,
S.E. Ullrich, J.A. Clancy, and I. Romagosa.1999. Inheritance and fine mapping
of a major barley seed dormancy QTL. Plant Sci. 143:113-118.
5. Han, F.,
S.E. Ullrich, A. Kleinhofs, B.L. Jones, P.M. Hayes, and D.M. Wesenberg. 1997.
Fine structure mapping of the barley chromosome 1 centromere region containing
malting quality QTL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:903-910.
6. Hayes,
P.M., A.E. Corey, R. Dovell, R. Karow, C. Undi, K. Rhinart, and H. Vivar. 2000.
Registration of Orca barley. Crop Sci. 40:849.
7. Hayes, P.
M., B. H. Liu, S. J. Knapp, F. Chen, B. Jones, T. Blake, J. Franckowiak, D
Rasmusson, M. Sorrells, S. E. Ullrich, D. Wesenberg and A. Kleinhofs. 1993. Quantitative trait locus effects and
environmental interaction in a sample of
North American barley germplasm.
Theor. Appl. Genet. 87: 392-401.
8. Igartua
E., M. Edney, B.G. Rossnagel, D. Spaner, W.G. Legge, G.J. Scoles, P.E.
Eckstein, G.A. Penner, N.A. Tinker, K.G. Briggs, and D.E. Falk. 2000.
Marker-based selection of QTL affecting grain and malt quality in two-row
barley. Crop Sci. 40:1426-1433.
9. Kandemir,
N., B.L. Jones, D.M. Wesenberg, S.E. Ullrich, and A. Kleinhofs. 2000. Marker
assisted analysis of three grain yield QTL in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using near isogenic lines. Molec. Breed.
6:157-167.
10. Larson,
S.R., D.K. Habernicht, T.K. Blake, and M. Adamson. 1997. Backcross gains for
six-rowed grain and malt qualities with introgression of a feed barley yield
QTL. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:52-57.
11. Marquez-Cedillo,
L.A., P.M. Hayes, B.L. Jones, A. Kleinhofs, W.G. Legge, B.G. Rossnagel, K.
Sato, S.E. Ullrich, D.M. Wesenberg, and the NABGMP. 2000. QTL analysis of malting quality in barley
based on the doubled haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties
representing different germplasm groups.
Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:173-184.
12. Marquez-Cedillo,
L.A., P.M. Hayes, A. Kleinhofs, W.G. Legge, B.G. Rossnagel, K. Sato, S.E.
Ullrich, D.M. Wesenberg, and the NABGMP. 2001.
QTL analysis of agronomic traits in barley based on the doubled-haploid
progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm
groups. Theor. Appl. Genet.
103:625-637.
13. Mather,
D.E., N.A. Tinker, D.E. LaBerge, M. Edney, B.L. Jones, B.G. Rossnagel, W.G.
Legge, K.G. Briggs, R.B. Irvine, D.E. Falk, and K.J. Kasha. 1997. Regions of
the genome that affect grain and malt quality in a North American two-row
barley cross. Crop Sci. 37:544-554.
14. Ramage, R.T.
1977. Male sterile facilitated recurrent selection and happy homes. p. 92-98.
in S. Barghout et al., (ed.). Proc. 4th reg. winter cereals
workshop, vol. 2. barley. Amman, Jordan.
15. Romagosa,
I., F. Han, S.E. Ullrich, P.M. Hayes, and D.M. Wesenberg. 1999. Verification of
yield QTL through realized molecular marker assisted selection responses in a
barley cross. Molec. Breed. 5:143-152.
16. Tinker,
N.A., D.E. Mather, B.G. Rossnagel, K.J. Kasha, A. Kleinhofs, P.M. Hayes, D.E.
Falk, Ferguson, L.P. Shugar, W.G. Legg, R.B. Irvine, T.M. Choo, K.G. Briggs,
S.E. Ullrich, J.D. Franckowiak, T. Blake, R.J. Graf, S.M. Dofing, M.A. Saghai
Maroof G.J. Scoles, D. Hoffman, L.S. Dahleen, A. Kilian, F. Chen, R.M.
Biyashev, D.A. Kudrna, and B.J. Steffenson.
1996. Regions of the genome that affect agronomic performance in two-row
barley. Crop Sci. 36:1053-1062.
17. Toojinda,
T., E. Baird, A. Booth, L. Broers, P. Hayes, W. Powell, W. Thomas, H. Vivar,
and G. Young. 1998. Introgression of qualitative trait loci (QTLs) determining
stripe rust resistance in barley: an example of marker-assisted line
development. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:123-131.
18. Ullrich
S.E., F. Han, and B.L. Jones. 1997. Genetic complexiy of the malt extract trait
in six-row spring barley suggested by QTL analysis. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 55:1-4.
19. Zhu, H.,
G. Briceno, R. Dovel, P.M. Hayes, B.H. Liu, C.T. Liu, and S.E. Ullrich. 1999.
Molecular breeding for grain yield in barley: An evaluation of QTL effects in a
spring barley cross. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:772-779.
20. Zhu, H.,
L. Golchrist, P. Hayes, A. Kleinhofs, D. Kudrna, Z. Liu, L. Prom, B.
Steffenson, T. Toojinda, and H. Vivar. 1999. Does function follow form?
Principle QTLs for Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance are coincident with
QTLs for inflorescence traits and plant height in a doubled-haploid population
of barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:1221-1232.
S.E.
Ullrich, Ullrich@wsu,edu, 509-335-4936
Digital Plant Breeding. Mario C.
Therrien AAFC Brandon Research Centre,
Brandon, MB. Canada
In recent
years, electronic devices for measuring plant parameters, such as crop density,
and gathering digital information, such as digital cameras, have become robust
and relatively inexpensive. Their ability to rapidly measure physical and optical
properties has made these devices a potentially useful set of tools in a
breeding program by measuring or predicting useful agronomic traits. Five
different digital devices were assessed for their practicality and utility in
identifying high (grain and forage) yielding genotypes of barley for potential
use in a breeding program. These included 1) a digital camera, 2) a crop canopy
analyzer, 3) a chlorophyll fluorometer, 4) a SPAD meter, and 5) a
multi-spectral radiometer. Nine barley cultivars were chosen, widely differing
in genetic background and agronomic performance, and were planted at two
locations over two years. Each device was used throughout the growing season at
emergence, tillering, shot blade, boot, anthesis, and grainfill stages (except the
block harvested as silage). Values obtained were correlated with grain and
biomass yield. The digital camera and SPAD meter were also used to examine
disease load and incidence at anthesis and grainfill. As well, the digital
camera also measured harvested grain parameters. Each device was also assessed
for ease of use and cost/benefit. Results show that all the devices were able
to predict grain or biomass yield, or both, except for the fluorometer. The
digital camera and SPAD meter were also useful for measuring other traits. The
SPAD meter gave the best overall results.
Mario C.
Therrien, Mtherrien@em.agr.ca,
204-726-7650
Breeding
for lower DON response in six-row malting barley using conventional methods and
existing germplasm. Dr. D.B. Cooper Busch Agricultural Resources Inc. 3515 E. Co. Rd.
52, Ft. Collins, CO 81024
Fusarium
head blight (FHB) on malting barley has become an important limitation on the
stable supply of acceptable malt barley in the upper mid-western United States.
Considerable effort has been made to screen germplasm for sources of resistance
to both the pathogen itself and for sources of reduced deoxynivalenol (DON)
content in the grain. The relatively large environmental effects for both
resistance and DON content have made it difficult to identify lines with better
response. After several location x years of screening for DON content in our
breeding program we tentatively identified several lines with lower DON
content. We inter-crossed these lines
in a partial diallel mating design. The resulting progeny were made available
to all interested public malt barley breeding programs in the region and with
their assistance we measured the DON content over several generations and over
a wide range of environments. Combining
ability analysis of DON content confirmed that the principle mode of gene
action was additive. Some specific combinations had lower DON than predicted on
an additive basis only, indicating limited broad-sense specific combining
ability was also present. We recently
solicited lines with better response to FHB from the public programs and hand
crossed them with our best lines in the greenhouse. We obtained seed set on 322 of the possible 410 half-diallel
combinations. The F1 generation of these new crosses will be
increased in Arizona during the fall of 2002 and returned to Ft. Collins for a
first cycle of random mating in the spring of 2003 using GenesisTM
hybridizing agent. We expect cycle-1 F2 seed should be available to
interested parties for planting and selection in the spring of 2004.
Dr. D.B
Cooper, blake.cooper@anheuser-busch.com,
(970) 472-2327.
GrainGenes
and Other Public Databases for Barley Genomics. Victoria Carollo1,
David Matthews2, Gerard Lazo1, Olin Anderson1,
1USDA-ARS-WRRC, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710; 2Cornell
University, Dept. of Plant Breeding, Ithaca NY 14853
Sequencing
efforts in the last few years have yielded an enormous wealth of data for
Triticeae genomics. GrainGenes (http://www.graingenes.org), the USDA-ARS
sponsored Triticeae database holds records for over 150,000 barley gene EST
sequences. Although sequences are
deposited in to the GenBank and are available to the public, further efforts by
the bioinformaticists at the USDA-ARS have improved the accessibility and offer
unprecedented ways to view and manipulate these data. GrainGenes curators have worked with curators at Gramene (www.gramene.org) and NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) to provide data
and link to comparative mapping tools for barley. Sequence and locus records in GrainGenes are also linked to
external databases including GenBank and the UniGene clusters for the Triticeae
at NCBI, TIGR tentative consensus sequences (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/) and
the “Genome View” at Gramene, the USDA-ARS sponsored resource for comparative
mapping in grains. Gramene users can
align the North American Barley Genome Mapping Project (NABGMP) Steptoe x Morex
maps with selected maps from rice, wheat, oat, maize and sorghum. Another new comparative mapping tool is
available at the Plant Genomes Central, a new site at NCBI dedicated to plant
genomics (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMGifs/Genomes/PlantList.html). Barley maps can be compared to each other
and include two consensus maps, the NABGMP Steptoe x Morex and Harrington x
TR306.
Victoria
Carollo, vcarollo@pw.usda.gov,
510-559-5944
Genetic and physical mapping towards
map-based cloning in barley. Kleinhofs, Andris, Dept Crop & Soil Sciences and School of Molecular Biosciences,
Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420
Map-based
cloning in large genome organisms such as barley is tedious and expensive. It should be avoided if the homologous gene
can be obtained from the small genome monocot model rice. However, rice does not have all the genes we
might be interested in i.e. rust resistance genes. Within the Triticeae barley is the organism of choice for
map-based cloning due to the extensive genetic maps and an excellent publicly
available BAC library. Map-based
cloning in barley has already been successful.
The mlo, Rar1, Mla, Rpg1 genes have been cloned using this approach and a BAC
contig including the rpg4 gene has
been constructed. Construction of the
BAC contigs including the stem rust resistance genes Rpg1 and rpg4 and the
cloning of Rpg1 will be
presented. This work was accomplished
by chromosome walking. In order to
avoid this tedious approach, we developed a system of targeted map saturation
based on the rice genome sequence data and Triticeae EST database. In this approach we identify Triticeae ESTs
with homology to rice genomic sequence with synteny to the region of
interest. The Triticeae ESTs are mapped
at low resolution, BAC clones identified and contigs established. This approach was used to target the Rcs5 gene. Progress will be reported.
Andris
Kleinhofs, andyk@wsu.edu, 509-335-4389
HarvEST
Triticeae: a portable EST database viewer for barley researchers and others. Steve Wanamaker and Timothy
J. Close, Department of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of
California, Riverside, CA, 92521-0124, USA
HarvEST
Triticeae is a portable EST database-viewer that emphasizes gene function and
is oriented to the design of oligonucleotides, supporting microarray content
design, BAC library screening, and PCR-based genetic mapping. The software is downloadable from http://harvest.ucr.edu and will run on any
PC that uses Windows and meets the minimum hardware configuration. Version 0.86 (released July 2002) contains
more than 258,000 barley EST sequences representing about 40,000 unigenes. All EST sequences have been quality trimmed,
cleaned of vector, and assembled using CAP3.
For key features of HarvEST, no internet connection is required. Key features include: unigene output from
archived contig assemblies, Boolean searching with user-defined quantitative
settings, archived BLAST hit information, and various other searching,
reporting and export functions. The
unigene feature can be applied to entire assemblies, individual libraries, or
any combination of libraries. For
Boolean searches, a user sets search parameters according to their
interest. For example, the choice could
be genes associated with a particular stress (e.g. low temperature, heat,
drought, pathogen, nitrogen deprivation), developmental stage (e.g. malted
seed, 20 DAP spike), or tissue (e.g. endosperm, pericarp, rachis, root
tip). The user also decides what
percentage representation is relevant.
Once the choices have been made, the search is fully executed and a
browsable output is displayed. The
output can be viewed on-screen or exported as summary tables or sequence
files. HarvEST also facilitates
connection to NCBI for live BLAST searches of the public EST database.
Timothy J.
Close, timothy.close@ucr.edu,
909-787-3318.
Using EST databases for functional and comparative
bioinformatics. Warren M. Kruger and Gary J. Muehlbauer University of Minnesota, St. Paul MN 55108
High
throughput sequencing capacity, comprehensive sequence databases and algorithms
for finding sequence similarity has facilitated the use of expressed sequence
tags (ESTs) for gene discovery. Functional and comparative analysis of ESTs was
used to identify genes expressed when barley is infected by Fusarium graminearum (Fg) and Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei (Bgh). A database of 8,400
non-redundant sequences was created from almost 20,000 ESTs, generated from a
Fusarium- and three powdery mildew-infected cDNA libraries. Functional
annotations were derived from BLASTX hits (P≤10-5) to proteins
in Genbank’s non-redundant protein database. We found 982 genes expressed in
response to Fg and Bgh of which 29 were not found amongst 130,000 barley ESTs
generated from various uninfected tissues. 72% (21/29) of these genes encode
unknown proteins and 14% (4/29) encode amino acid metabolic proteins. Genes
encoding structural, metabolic and stress-related proteins, e.g. PR proteins,
glutathione S-transferase and aluminum-induced proteins, were the most
abundantly expressed in response to Fg and Bgh. 143 Fg and Bgh genes were not
found in over 8,000 Fg and 4,700 Bgh ESTs generated from non-infective fungal
tissue. A subset of 13 genes did not have homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Neurospora
crassa and may represent fungal virulence factors. We identified 70 genes
specifically expressed in at least two plant-microbe interactions, suggesting
that there are similarities between all plant-microbe interactions.
Warren M.
Kruger, kruge002@umn.edu, (612)
625-9701
Parallel Expression Analysis using Barley
Microarrays. Roger Wise1, Rico Caldo1, Stacy Turner2,
Dan Ashlock3, and Julie Dickerson4. 1USDA-ARS & Plant Pathology, 2Bioinformatics
and Computational Biology, 3Mathematics, and 4Computer
& Electrical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011-1020
In small
grain Triticeae crops, the molecular characterization of genes coincident with
disease, response to biotic or abiotic stresses, or cellular development has
traditionally followed a “one-gene-at-a-time” approach. However, recent advances in microarray
technology now allow the parallel investigation of up to 22,500 genes in a
single experiment. Early next year, a
USDA-IFAFS-funded barley GeneChip will be available from Affymetrix. We will utilize our microarray to identify
new, undiscovered genes that up- or down-regulated in response to biotic and
abiotic stresses. In order to
effectively access, compare, and manipulate up to 500,000 data points per
experiment, this project will create an on-line interactive database,
BarleyBase, and develop a set of web-accessible tools for the analysis of
Affymetrix GeneChip data. BarleyBase
will feature “click through” integration of the data on the web and it will be
interoperable with the Gramene comparative mapping resource for grains (http://www.gramene.org/). The web-based analysis tools will enable
database users to identify subsets of genes that change expression in response
to drought, cold stress, disease, or other treatments. These tools will accelerate agronomic and
quality research in cereals, one of the world’s most important food sources.
Roger
Wise, rpwise@iastate.edu, 515-294-9756
Effectiveness of in vitro
selection in barley for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance.
M. Banik1, W.G. Legge1,
B. Bizimungu2, J. Tucker1, M.C. Therrien1, A.
Tekauz2, F. Edes3 and
M. Savard4. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada- 1 Brandon
Research Centre, Brandon, MB, 2Cereal Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB,
3 Lethbridge Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB, 4Eastern
Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Deoxynivalenol (DON), the most
prevalent mycotoxin produced by Fusarium
graminearum Schwab, plays an important role in Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) pathogenesis. DON or a mixture of DON with other mycotoxins,
15-acetyldeoxynivalenol and T2, were added to anther culture media to evaluate
feasibility of in vitro selection for
increasing the level of Fusarium resistance in barley. Three barley genotypes
and 7 F1 hybrids with varying levels of FHB resistance were in vitro selected in the presence of
toxin. All fertile, selected and
control double haploids were tested in the FHB nursery at Brandon, MB, in
2000-2001 under artificial infection and DON content was determined by ELISA
technique. Although not statistically
significant (P>0.5), several lines showed a lower DON content (AC Metcalfe
99/30-2, Excel 99/12-3, Robust DT00-14) in comparison with their respective
parental genotype. In vitro selected
Excel lines generally had lower DON content and responded the best. Among 7 different crosses, only in vitro selected segregating lines of
two row types from Chevron/CDC Fleet had significantly lower DON content than
the two-row and six-row control lines. Thus, in vitro selection appeared to be effective in two row types of
Chevron/CDC Fleet cross. Further
testing with more replication over years will be required to confirm the
results.
Mitali
Banik, mbanik@agr.gc.ca, 204-726-7650
Characterization
of the barley stem rust resistance gene Rpg1
family. R. Brueggeman*, N. Rostoks*, D. Kudrna*,
A. Druka*, A. Kleinhofs*‡. *Department of Crop and Soil Sciences and ‡School
of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420,
USA
The barley stem rust resistance
gene Rpg1 encodes a protein with
homology to receptor like kinases (RLKs) with two tandem protein kinase
domains, a novel structure for a plant disease resistance gene. The Rpg1
gene family was identified by hybridization of 10 arrayed different tissue cDNA
libraries containing approximately 500,000 clones. Using an Rpg1 probe,
one cDNA clone was identified from a very similar member of the gene family
(ABC1037) and another from a more distantly related member (ABC1036). Hybridization of the more diverged family member
ABC1036 back to the cDNA libraries identified a closely related member
(ABC1040) and a more distant member ABC1041. A BLASTn search of the Triticeae
EST database using the ABC1041 sequence revealed another gene (ABC1063) which
is closely related to ABC 1041 , but further diverged from Rpg1. These five cDNA
representatives of the Rpg1 gene
family and their genomic counterparts were completely sequenced and
mapped. The closely related member
ABC1037 is linked to Rpg1 (about
40kb) and probably represents a recent duplication event. ABC1036 and ABC1040 mapped to chromosome
7(5H) and are very closely linked.
ABC1041 mapped very close to the stem rust resistance gene rpg4 on chromosome 7(5H), but is not rpg4.
ABC1063 has not been mapped.
Characterization of this gene family will provide insight into function
and evolution of this novel resistance gene family in barley and other
Triticeae.
Robert
Brueggeman, bigbass@wsu.edu, 509-523-5302
Multivariate
Analysis of Malting Quality. Allen D.
Budde, Lauri Herrin and Berne L. Jones. USDA/ARS, Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, WI 53726
Around 4500 barleys are malted and
their malting qualities analyzed at the Cereal Crops Research Unit each
year. For several years, we have
utilized a computerized scoring system to assist us in selecting those lines
having the best malting quality. For
the 2000 and 2001 crop year submissions, Principal Component Analyses (PCA)
were performed on the malting quality values to determine whether the best
performing lines could be distinguished from the less desirable ones. The data from the two- and six-rowed
varieties were analyzed separately because their ideal malt quality parameters,
as listed by the American Malting Barley Association in their ‘Analytical
Guidelines to Barley Breeders’, differ.
The analytical results were normalized, subjected to PCA, and the
results were plotted and compared with the computer generated ‘quality scores’
for each line. The scores of the best
performing lines, as calculated by our quality scoring method, clustered
together near the site that represented an ‘ideal’ malting barley. Principal component analyses of the barley
submissions will provide information that can nicely supplement, or perhaps even
replace, our current malt quality scoring system for identifying the best
performing barleys.
Allen D. Budde, adbudde@wisc.edu, (608) 262-4483
Breeding BYDV Resistant Barley
With an Agronomically Improved Background.
Flavio
Capettini1, Monique Henry2 and Hugo Vivar2. 1ICARDA/CIMMYT, 2CIMMYT, 1&2Apdo Postal
6-641, 06600 México D.F., México
Barley
Yellow Dwarf is the most important viral disease of barley, having the potential
to destroy entire crops in some Latin American countries and worldwide.
Breeding for this devastating disease is one of the most important objectives
of the ICARDA/CIMMYT barley breeding program, which has been successful to
produce resistant or tolerant germplasm in a agronomically enhanced genetic
background. Selection against susceptible genotypes has been carried out for
more than 20 years in the Toluca Experiment Station of CIMMYT in Mexico, where
symptoms are frequent under natural conditions. Artificial inoculation with
greenhouse-reared aphids is also done in screening nurseries under field
conditions to assure uniform infection, to differentiate biotype reaction and
reduce the risk of escapes. The three serotypes most commonly found in the
Americas, PAV, MAV and RPV, are used. Plots inoculated with one biotype each
and a fourth plot is a check kept free of aphids by insecticide applications.
The most common and effective source of tolerance to BYDV in barley has been
identified in Ethiopian barleys and found to be associated to the major semi
dominant geneYd2. This gene has been reported to be associated with
reduction in virus concentration with PAV and MAV but not with RPV. An assay
based on a protein showing allelic variation that correlates with Yd2
and a PCR marker for the YD2 associated allele Ylp has been used
in the program screened genotypes, finding that the Yd2 gene was present
in the genotypes showing field tolerance. Elite lines tested showed field
tolerance to PAV and MAV as well as to RPV, indicating that additional gene(s)
conferring resistance to this serotype should also be present in the germplasm.
Flavio Capettini, f.capettini@cgiar.org, +52 55 804-7558.
GrainGenes: The Triticeae
Genome Database. Victoria Carollo1, David Matthews2, Gerard Lazo1,
Olin Anderson1;1USDA-ARS-WRRC, 800 Buchanan Street,
Albany, CA 94710; 2Cornell University, Dept. of Plant Breeding,
Ithaca NY 14853
GrainGenes, the Triticeae
genome database (http://www.graingenes.org), is the most comprehensive source
of information on barley, wheat, rye and oats. GrainGenes is maintained at the
USDA/ARS/WRRC in Albany, CA and is a central
repository for information on gene and expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences,
genetic and physical maps, DNA probes, germplasm, pathology, and other data
types. GrainGenes may also be accessed through a
mirror site at NRC-PBI, Saskatoon, Canada (gene.pbi.nrc.ca/graingenes/). Recent barley related additions to GrainGenes
include an expanded image collection from the Oregon Wolfe Barleys, several
interactive maps including two with SSR markers and the barley bin maps from
Washington State University. These bin
maps include markers from several map studies and are available via Gbrowser, a
new map-viewing tool developed by the Generic Model Organism Database Project
that has been implemented on GrainGenes.
Other collaborative efforts are available via GrainGenes including TREP,
a Triticeae repeat sequence database (wheat.pw.usda.gov/ITMI/Repeats/) and a
Triticeae EST-SSR Coordination project
(wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/ITMI/2002/EST-SSR).
Victoria
Carollo, vcarollo@pw.usda.gov,
510-559-5944
A proposal for the use of pedigree and historical
data for marker trait association in
barley. Federico
Condon1, Kevin P.
Smith1 Brian Steffenson2, 1Department
of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford
Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108. 2Plant Pathology Department, 1991 Upper
Buford Circle, St. Paul MN 55108
The
identification of associations between phenotypes and molecular markers in the
core germplasm of a breeding program could be very useful in crop improvement.
This information would eventually allow the identification of potential QTLs
without having to develop mapping populations, avoid the presence of
undesirable traits in the population and represent the true genetic diversity
available to a breeder (Jannink et
al, 2002). Since the assumptions of
normal distribution and independence is not valid in a non-structured
population, this approach should take into account population structure. With
this objective, the co-ancestry coefficients between pairs of genotypes is used
as a factor in a linear mixed model to asses the expected covariance among
genotypes. A set of historical genotypes comprised of variety candidates from
the University of Minnesota barley breeding program, and their ancestors were
genotyped with 60 SSR primers, and evaluated in the field at three locations in
2002. We observed significant variation in plant height (54 to 97cm), heading
date (up to 20 difference), and disease severity for F. graminearum (23
- 93%) and spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) (3.5 –65%). The
preliminary results of association mapping between the molecular markers and
this set of phenotypes will be presented.
Kevin Smith, smith376@tc.umn.edu, (612) 624-1211
Evaluation of Bowman
Backcross-derived Barley Genetic Stocks. Jerome D. Franckowiak and
An Hang. Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo,
ND 58105 and USDA-ARS, National Small Grains Germplasm Research Facility,
Aberdeen, ID 83210.
Morphological
mutants are a valuable genetic resource in barley, Hordeum vulgare.
Placing visually identifiable mutants into a common genetic background,
represented by the spring, two-rowed cultivar Bowman, can help determine their
pleiotropic effects and locate closely linked genetic traits. For example,
linkage drag with traits such as spike type (vrs1 and Int-c),
smooth awn (raw1 and raw2), anthocyanin pigmentation (Rst1),
and brittle rachis (Btr) has helped to associate mutants with specific
chromosome regions (Franckowiak, 1995). (See the attached maps.) Agronomic data
were collected on over 650 Bowman backcross-derived genetic stocks in nurseries
grown near Christchurch, New Zealand and Aberdeen, ID. These sites were chosen
to optimize survival of weak lines and to provide seed for the USDA-ARS Barley
Genetic Stock Collection at Aberdeen. Based on the data collected, a number of
general observations can be made. Many mutants modify the expression of several
agronomic traits. Chlorophyll mutants frequently showed maturity delays and had
smaller grain. Lines with early heading or reduced tillering genes tended to
have large kernels. Resistance to leaf rust, incited by Puccinia hordei,
was associated with larger grain and higher yields in New Zealand. Lines having
a dominant trait that is found in wild barley often had higher yields. Most
semidwarf lines yielded less than Bowman. Based on loci position and agronomic
data, about 190 of the Bowman backcross-derived lines were chosen for inclusion
in the genetic stocks portion of the barley core collection.
Jerome D.
Franckowiak, j.franckowiak@ndsu.nodak.edu (701)
231-7540
Evaluation of Hulless Barley
Germplasm at Aberdeen, ID. A. Hang, K. Satterfield, and C. S. Burton. USDA-ARS,
National Small Grains Germplasm Research Facility, Aberdeen, ID.
Over 95% of barley grain produced
in North America is for animal feed and for malting while the rest is used for
seed or for human consumption. Although
most barley cultivars are “hulled”,
researchers recently have indicated that hulless grain has a higher feed value
than hulled barley. In human nutrition
studies, beta-glucan and tocotrienols in barley grain are reported to have
cholesterol-lowering properties.
Beta-glucan in barley also reduces glucose intolerance and insulin
resistance, which could improve glucose metabolism and delay or reduce the risk
of developing type 2 diabetes.
Development of hulless barley with increased beta-glucan and protein
contents could help meet the demand for healthy food and could provide new
opportunities for growers and the food industry. Forty hulless barley lines from the USDA National Small Grains
Collection were planted at various locations in Idaho; agronomic data including
heading date, plant height, seed yield, and test weight were recorded.
Eight-gram seed samples from each line also were sent to the USDA Cereal
Research Unit at Madison, WI for analysis of protein, beta-glucan, and lipid
contents. Seed yield and test weight of
several hulless lines were comparable with the check cultivars. Eleven lines had protein content varying
from 17.12 to 18.28% and three lines had beta-glucan levels ranging from 7.60
to 9.47%. These lines will be used as
germplasm for further improvement of hulless barley.
An Hang, anhang@uidaho.edu (208) 397-4162. Ext. 119
A New Look
at Location Yield Data. James H. Helm,
Patricia Juskiw and Tim Duggan, Field Crop Development Centre, Lacombe, AB,
Canada.
When multi-year and multi-location
data are analyzed, they are most often summarized on a geographic basis over
years. This combines sites and years
that are in a geographic area despite production levels. The fallacy of this becomes evident when
drought , soil fertility or heavy rainfall makes a site or year significantly
different than the norm. The Field Crop
Development Centre has developed a SAS based program called the FCDC Data Miner
that allows the search of all data bases across years and locations and has the
power to present the summary of the data in either geographic zonal format or
by yield level of the test that the selected varieties are in. The presentation of data according to yield
level of the trial has the advantage of comparing lines in low, medium low,
medium high and high yielding environments.
The yield response curves can be graphed in relation to a specific check
variety or to the mean of the test.
This type of analysis shows the best varieties for low yielding
environments as well as those varieties that respond well to higher yielding
environments. Also built into the
software is the potential to screen by protein content so that malting barleys
grown in tests with selectable protein content can be compared together while
those tests that deliver higher or lower protein content can be evaluated for
yield potential in a feed environment.
Beside yield and protein, we can also look at kernel weight, test
weight, maturity, height, whole plant biomass and other agronomic
characteristics.
James H. Helm, James.helm@gov.ab.ca, 403-782-8696
The Stability of Diastatic Power QTL Expression in
Western Six-rowed Barley Backgrounds and Environments: The Initial Phases. David Hoffman and An Hang, USDA-ARS Aberdeen,
Idaho
Malting barley is an important crop in Idaho and other western
US states. Emphasis at Aberdeen has
been on developing two-rowed spring malting cultivars although some two- and
six-rowed winter lines look promising.
Several spring two-row malting spring cultivars approved for malting are
available to western growers, but six-rowed barleys have greater yield
potential. Currently, there are no
western spring six-rowed cultivars recommended for malting. Midwestern malting six-rowed barleys have
been used in the western US, but, in the west, they are usually tall and
weak-strawed, and often lodge, especially under irrigation. In contrast, western-adapted six-rowed
barleys such as Colter, have stiff straw, high yield potential, and adequate
malt extract, but lack the sufficient diastatic power (DP) levels required for
commercial malting. We have initiated a
study to evaluate three major DP QTL regions in various western six-rowed
genetic backgrounds when grown in various production environments. Following selection of the recipient
cultivars, the next step will be to develop the appropriate near-isogenic lines
for multi-environment DP testing. We wish to learn which DP QTL are the most
effective in various six-rowed backgrounds and how environment influences DP
expression and if genotype by environment interactions exist. The information gathered from this project
will help barley geneticists perform marker-assisted DP enhancements of
high-yielding western six-rowed barleys and will serve as a guide for other
malting traits that may need adjustment.
David
Hoffman, dhoffman@uidaho.edu, 208-397-4162 ext. 125
Non-Starch
Polysaccharides in Barley. M. S.
Izydorczyk and S. Bazin, Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research
Laboratory, 1404-303 Main St., Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Non-starch
polysaccharides in barley –β-glucans, arabinoxylans and arabinogalactans –
together with the enzymes responsible for their modification, play an important
role in barley processing and quality attributes of barley-derived
products. Clear understanding of the
molecular basis of functionality of these polysaccharides is necessary to gain
control over mechanisms responsible for their behaviour during the malting and
brewing processes. In the present
study, non-starch polysaccharides were extracted from barley, malt, and wort to
monitor the changes these polymers undergo during processing. Both water (at
various temperature) as well as alkali were used during the extraction to fully
elucidate the structure and properties of water soluble and insoluble
polymers. Both polysaccharides,
β$-glucans and arabinoxylans, exhibited a high degree of polydispersity
and very high molecular weights. Both
polymers have a tendency for intermolecular aggregation and even formation of
three-dimensional networks, although the mechanisms of gelation differ
substantially between these polysaccharides.
The molecular structure of β$-glucans and arabinoxylans will be
discussed in terms of monosaccharides and linkage composition, degree of
branching and substitution patterns.
Arabinogalactans constitute the third group of barley non-starch
polysaccharides. Our results indicate
that the outer tissues of barley grain contain more arabinogalactans than the
endosperm and that the molecular structure of arabinogalactans changes
depending on their location in the kernel.
M.S.
Izydorczyk, (204)983-1300
Proteinases and Proteinase
Inhibitors of Barley and Malt. Berne L. Jones, USDA-ARS,
Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, WI 53726
For several years, we have been
studying the biochemistry behind the protein degradation that must occur during
malting and brewing in order to produce good beer. Two protein groups apparently control this solubilization of
barley proteins; the endoproteinases and their proteinaceous inhibitors. The cysteine class proteinases probably play
the biggest role in protein solubilization, but representatives of all four
protease classes are present in green malt.
We previously identified, purified and studied some of the cysteine
protease inhibitors. Recently, we purified
and characterized some of the metalloproteinases and what appears to be the
main serine proteinase (which we have called SEP-1) of green malt. The metalloproteinases seem to play a role
in solubilizing storage proteins during malting and mashing, whereas the serine
proteinase apparently neither hydrolyzes storage proteins nor affects the mash
soluble protein levels. Its role in
germination is still not known. We have
now identified, purified and characterized compounds in barley and malt
extracts that inhibit the SEP-1 activity.
Some of these were proteins that belonged to the ‘CM’
(chloroform-methanol soluble) proteins group, but not all CM proteins inhibited
the SEP-1. Although we have neither
looked for nor detected any proteinaceous inhibitors that affect the
metalloproteinases, their existence has been reported. It thus appears that it is common for
inhibitors of the various proteinase classes to occur in malted barley. It should, therefore, be possible to
manipulate the concentrations and activities of both the enzymes and their
inhibitors to improve the malting quality of future barleys.
Berne L.
Jones, bljones@facstaff.wisc.edu, 608-262-4480
Fast neutron induced barley mutants. Kleinhofs, A., and Kudrna, D., Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington
State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420
Fast neutron irradiation is
assumed to induce deletions and perhaps other chromosome rearrangements as
opposed to the strictly base substitution mutations induced by azide. In order to facilitate gene cloning and
identification, we started a fast neutron induced mutant collection. Seeds were irradiated at 3.5 and 4.0 Gy at
the FAO/IAEA Seibersdorf SNIF facility starting in 1992 and continuing every
year until the facility was closed. M1
seeds were grown at Pullman and M2 spikes as well as bulk seed
collected. M2 populations
were grown in the field and interesting visual mutants selected. Over 500 mutants have been cataloged with
some phenotype information. A few
mutants have been mapped. Information
along with pictures of some of the more interesting mutants will be presented.
Andris Kleinhofs, andyk@wsu.edu, 509-335-4389
Spike morphology and FHB reaction
in barley. Nadejda Krasheninnik and Jerome D. Franckowiak;
Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102
Spike
morphology in barley, controlled by the six-rowed spike 1 (vrs1) locus located in 2HL, is associated with Fusarium head blight (FHB) severity, which is
generally lower for most two-rowed genotypes than for six-rowed genotypes. The vrs1.a allele is present in most six-rowed cultivars and produces
well-developed lateral spikelets, the Vrs1.b
allele in two-rowed cultivars reduces lateral spikelets to sterile bracts with
a rounded tip, and the Vrs1.t (deficiens)
allele causes an extreme reduction in the size of lateral spikelets. Disease
occurrence and severity were thought to be determined in part by the spike
morphology, because reduced air-movement and higher humidity in case of
six-rowed spikes were considered favorable for FHB onset. FHB resistance QTLs
were mapped to the centromeric region of chromosome 2, close to the vrs1
locus, suggesting that a genetic association between spike
morphology and FHB reaction might exist. To test this hypothesis thirty-six
cultivars and experimental lines, containing spike morphology variants Vrs1.t, Vrs1.b, and vrs1.a, were
inoculated and screened for FHB resistance. The results suggest that barley
spike morphology and FHB reaction may be independent traits associated only by
linkage.
Nadejda
Krasheninnik, Nadejda.Krasheninnik@ndsu.nodak.edu,
(701) 231-7825
Mapping Genes Conferring Fusarium
Head Blight Resistance in C93-3230-24.
K.E. Lamb1, M.J. Green1,
R.D. Horsley1, and Zhang Bingxing2; 1Dep.
of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ. and 2Dep. of Plant
Protection, Zhejiang Univ.
The six-rowed line C93-3230-24,
from the cross B2912/Hietpas 5, was identified by researches at Busch
Agricultural Resources, Inc. (BARI) to have (FHB) resistance similar to
Chevron, and better FHB resistance than either of its parent in a greenhouse
test. The genetic background of
C93-3230-24 appears to be completely different than that of any of the FBH
resistant accessions identified. Thus,
this line may have alleles for FHB resistance and DON accumulation not
currently identified. The objectives of
this study are: 1) to construct skeletal maps that includes RFLP and SSR
markers for an F1-dervived DH mapping population developed from the
cross Foster/C93-3230-24 and 2) determine the position of QTL controlling FHB
resistance, DON accumulation, days to heading and maturity, plant height, and
spike nodding angle. Field experiments
were conducted in mist-irrigated FHB nurseries in 2001 and 2002 in North Dakota
and Zhejiang Province China using 118 DH lines and parents. Single locus analysis using available marker
data identified six regions in five chromosomes associated with FHB
resistance. The regions are located in
chromosomes 2H, 4H, 5H, 6H, and 7H. The
region with the largest effect on FHB resistance appears to be in chromosome
2H. Associations between the markers
and maturity and/or plant height were found in the same regions as FHB
resistance. Results in this study are
similar to those obtained in studies using the resistant six-rowed cultivar
‘Chevron’ and the ICARDA/CIMMYT
cultivar ‘Gobernadora’. Thus,
preliminary results suggest that C93-3230, Chevron, and Gobernadora may have
similar alleles for FHB resistance.
R. Horsley, Richard.Horsley@ndsu.nodak.edu,
701-231-8142
Transformation of Barley cv.
Conlon with Genes for Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight. M. Manoharan1, L.S. Dahleen2,
T. Hohn3, S.P. McCormick4, N.A. Alexander4, P.
Schwarz5, S. Neate6 and R.D. Horsley1. 1Dept.
of Plant Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND; 2USDA-ARS
Fargo, ND; 3Syngenta, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; 4USDA-ARS,
Peoria, IL; 5Dept. of Cereal Science, 6Dept. of Plant
Pathology, NDSU, Fargo, ND.
Fusarium head blight, incited
primarily by Fusarium graminearum, has caused devastating losses
to barley since the 1990’s. Production of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) by
F. graminearum is harmful to humans and livestock. Expressing certain
anti-toxin genes such as TRI101 and PDR5 could improve resistance
to fungal infection and reduce DON levels. TRI101 encodes a 3-OH
trichothecene acetyltransferase that converts DON to a less toxic acetylated
form. PDR5, an ATP-binding cassette, acts as an efflux transporter,
shunting DON across the plasma membrane from the interior of the cell. We have
transformed the commercial malting barley cultivar Conlon with these genes to
reduce DON levels in infected grain. Ten-day old calli derived from immature
embryos were co-bombarded with the herbicide-resistance gene bar as the
selectable marker. Putative transgenic plants were confirmed by Southern
analysis. A total of seven independent events with TRI101 and six with PDR5
were recovered. Northern analysis indicated the expression of TRI101 and
PDR5. Expression of TRI101 was further confirmed by detecting
acetyltransferase activity in seeds of the transgenic plants. T2 lines of
three events with TRI101 and two events with PDR5 were tested in
the field and the T3 in the greenhouse
for disease and toxin level. Both genes appeared to reduce FHB infection and
DON accumulation in some of the transgenic plants.
L.S.
Dahleen, dahleenl@fargo.ars.usda.gov,
701-239-1384
Using the
Re-steep Function for Hydrating Grain in the Joe White Micromalter.
Christopher H. Martens, Allen D.
Budde, and Berne L. Jones. USDA/ARS, Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison, WI
53726
Christopher H. Martens, chmarten@wisc.edu,
(608) 262-4483
Fungicide
Application Timings of Folicur and AMS 21619 for Fusarium Head Blight Control
in Six-Row and Two-Row Malting Barley. Kent McKay and Kristie Clark, North Central Research Extension Center,
Minot, North Dakota.
A six-row barley fungicide trial
was conducted at Minot, ND and a two-row barley fungicide trial was conducted
at Mohall, ND in 2002. The primary objectives of these studies were to evaluate
a single fungicide application with two split fungicide applications of Folicur
and AMS 21619 for Fusarium head blight control. A six-row malting barley,
‘Robust’, was planted on May 16 at Minot and a two-row Malting barley,
‘Conlon’, was planted on May 18 at Mohall.
Fungicide treatments at both locations were applied with a 10 foot hand-held
CO2 sprayer delivering 20 GPA water at 30 psi using twin-jet
nozzles. At both locations, the single fungicide application and the first
split fungicide application were applied when the barley was 100% headed. The
second split application was applied four days after the first application. Weather
conditions during heading and kernel formation stages were very dry at Minot
and Mohall. At both locations, the untreated plots had very low incidence of
Fusarium head blight (under 5%). Yield, test weight, and percent DON will be
evaluated with all treatments and will be presented at the poster session.
Kent McKay, Area Agronomy
Specialist, kmckay@ndsuext.nodak.edu,
701-857-7682
Fungicide Studies for Control
of Fusarium Head Blight of Barley in North Dakota, 1998-2002. McMullen, M1.,
Meyer, S1., Jordahl, J1., Pederson, J2., and
Halley, S3. 1
Dept. of Plant Pathology, 2Dept. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota
State University, Fargo, ND 58105; 3
Langdon Research Extension Center, Langdon, ND 58249
Ten fungicides, applied
alone or in combination, were evaluated for control of Fusarium head blight
(FHB) in barley field plots at Fargo, North Dakota from 1998-2002. Fungicides evaluated included Folicur
(tebuconazole), Tilt (propiconazole), Benlate (benomyl), Penncozeb (mancozeb),
Quadris (azoxystrobin), Stratego (Tilt + trifloxystrobin), BAS 500
(pyrachlostrobin), Caramba (metconazole), BAS 505 (experimental from BASF) and
AMS 21619 (experimental from Bayer CropScience). Of products tested, only mancozeb had federal registration
allowing application to barley heads, and Folicur had a Section 18 emergency
exemption since 1998 in North Dakota for use on barley for suppression of
FHB. Fungicides were applied in 18
gpa at 40 psi to six-row malting barley cultivars at early full head emergence,
using a hand-held boom equipped with forward/backward facing XR8001 flat fan
nozzles oriented 300 from horizontal. Of the ten fungicides tested, only Folicur at 4 fl oz/acre was
included in the field tests each year, as it had shown good efficacy in early
tests. Over the five years, Folicur
reduced FHB field severity (incidence x head severity) an average of 53.4% compared
to the untreated check. DON levels were
> 20 ppm in two of the five years and were reduced by only 12.9% with
Folicur treatment. Two fungicides, BAS 505 and AMS 21619, available for testing
in 2001 and 2002, provided slightly better reduction of FHB field severity than
Folicur. Further evaluation of
experimental fungicides for reduction of FHB and DON levels in barley is
needed.
Marcia McMullen, mmcmulle@ndsuext.nodak.edu,
701-231-7627
Mapping of QTL associated with nitrogen storage and
remobilization in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. Suzanne Mickelson1, Deven
See2, Fletcher D.
Meyer1, John P.
Garner1, Curt R. Foster1, Tom K. Blake3
and Andreas M. Fischer1. 1Montana
State University, Bozeman, MT 59717; 2Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; 3International
Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas ICARDA, Aleppo, Syrian Arab
Republic.
Nitrogen
uptake and metabolism are central for vegetative and reproductive plant growth.
This is reflected by the fact that N can be remobilized and reused within a
plant, and this process is crucial for yield in most annual crops. A population
of 146 barley RILs, derived from a cross between two varieties differing
markedly in grain protein concentration, was used to compare the location of
QTL associated with N uptake, storage and remobilization in flag leaves
relative to QTL controlling developmental parameters and grain protein
accumulation. Overlaps of support intervals for such QTL were found on several
chromosomes, with chromosomes 3 and 6 being especially important. For QTL on
these chromosomes, alleles associated with inefficient N remobilization were
associated with depressed yield and higher levels of total or soluble organic N
during grain filling and vice versa; therefore, genes directly involved in or
regulating N recycling may be located on these chromosomes. Interestingly, the
most prominent QTL for grain protein concentration (on chromosome 6) did not
co-localize with QTL for N remobilization. However, QTL peaks for nitrate and
soluble organic N were detected at this locus for plants grown in one of two
years in the study. For these, alleles associated with low grain protein
concentration were associated with higher soluble N levels in leaves during
grain filling; therefore, gene(s) found at this locus might influence the N
sink strength of developing barley grains.
Suzanne Mickelson,
smickelson@montana.edu, (406) 994-5055
Status of
RWA-resistant barley germplasm. D.W. Mornhinweg, USDA-ARS, Stillwater, OK, P.P.
Bregitzer, Darrell Wesenberg USDA-ARS,
Aberdeen, ID, Bob Hammon, Frank Peairs, Colorado
State U.
Russian wheat aphid (RWA), Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko), is a
devastating pest on barley in the western U.S.
First identified in the US in 1986 it spread throughout the
intermountain regions of the western US and into Canada by 1988. All currently grown barley cultivars were
highly susceptible to RWA and losses were high. Screening of the entire National Small Grains Collection of Hordeum vulgare by the USDA-ARS in
Stillwater, identified 109 accessions with some level of RWA resistance. Unadapted RWA-resistant germplasm lines were
developed from each of these accessions and two were released to breeders, STARS-9301B
and STARS-9577B. Although highly
resistant, these lines were very unadapted to US barley production and were
quite poor in terms of grain yield and
malting quality. A prebreeding program
was initiated cooperatively by the USDA-ARS in Stillwater, OK and Aberdeen, ID
to bring RWA resistance into adapted backgrounds that could be utilized more
effectively for cultivar development by breeders in all barley growing areas of
the U.S After 2 years of preliminary
yield testing, 56 RWA-resistant germplasm lines are possible for release
involving 14 susceptible backgrounds (spring, winter, feed, malt) and 32
resistant sources.
D.W. Mornhinweg, dmornhinweg@pswcrl.ars.usda.gov,
(405) 624-4141 ext. 237
Evaluation of near-isogenic lines
for Fusarium Head Blight resistance QTL in barley. L. M.
Nduulu, A. Mesfin, G. J. Muehlbauer, and K. P. Smith*.
Dept. of Agronomy and Plant
Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
In a mapping population created
with the FHB resistant cultivar Chevron and elite susceptible breeding line
M69, we identified two candidate quantitative trait loci (QTL) for
marker-assisted-selection (MAS). However,
to employ MAS effectively, these QTL must be validated and more precisely
mapped to identify markers that will be useful in breeding. In the current study, we have used two
methods to develop near-isogenic lines (NILs) for two QTL regions (one on chromosome
2H and another on chromosome 6H) associated with FHB resistance. In the first method, we used molecular
marker-assisted backcrossing to develop BC3 NILs using markers
flanking the two regions of interest.
In the second method, we used molecular markers to identify NILs from
heterogeneous inbred families (HIFs) that are segregating for the regions of
interest. A total of 30 NILs isogenic
for these two regions were evaluated for percent of FHB infection, heading
date, and plant height in two locations in 2002.The mean FHB severity of the BC
derived NILs carrying the Chevron allele for the chromosome 2H QTL was 18.4%
compared to 42.9% for M69. On the
contrary, the mean FHB severity of the BC derived NIL carrying the Chevron
allele for the chromosome 6H QTL was 44.0% (not significantly different from
M69). These preliminary results
indicate that it is more efficient to use markers flanking the chromosome 2H
QTL region for MAS as compared to using markers flanking the chromosome 6H QTL
region. Further analyses of all traits
evaluated for the BC derived NILs will be presented. Additionally, we are in the process of analyzing data from the
HIF derived NILs. Results of those
analyses will also be presented.
Kevin Smith, smith376@tc.umn.edu, (612) 624-1211
Predicting Relative Maturity in Barley Using Spikes. Joseph Nyachiro*, James Helm, Patricia Juskiw, Donald
Salmon, Kequan Xi and Jennifer Zantinge, Field Crop Development Centre, Lacombe, AB Canada.
Relative physiological
maturity in barley is an important genetic trait especially in temperate
regions where the thriving of barley cultivars could be influenced by the
number of frost-free days. We studied relative physiological maturity, with the
objective of determining the effect of genotype, environment
(location-by-years), and genotype-by-environment interactions on maturity. A wide range of barley genotypes was grown in
non-replicated field tests in multiple locations in Alberta, Canada in three
consecutive years 1998, 1999 and 2000. Spikes
were harvested and used to determine relative maturity of each genotype. The results showed relative spike maturity trends in
genotypes were similar among years although the magnitude differed from year to
year. There was significant (P <
0.05) location x year interaction but non-significant location x genotype and
genotype x year interactions. Barley spikes could be used to predict relative
maturity of barley genotypes.
Joseph
Nyachiro, joseph.nyachiro@gov.ab.ca,
403-782-8692
Potential NIRS Application for
Plant Breeding & Production Research. Lori
Oatway and Jim Helm, Field Crop
Development Centre, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada.
Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)
has been used in the Cereal Breeding Program at the Field Crop Development
Centre (FCDC) for over 20 years but recent advances in NIRS technology and
computers has further increased its potential. Over the past eight years the
FCDC has taken advantage of the new NIRS advances and developed equations for
all areas of the barley breeding program. In the feed quality area these
equations include Protein, Protein Digestibility, Energy, Energy Digestibility,
Digestible Energy Content and Lysine. NIR equations developed to determine
malting quality include Fine Extract, Diastatic Power, Alpha-Amylase, Total
Malt Protein, Soluble Malt Protein, Malt B-Glucan, Friability, Homogeneity and
Viscosity. Food quality characteristics
that are analyzed by NIRS include Starch, B-Glucan, Pentosans, Ash, Lipid, Soluble
Fiber, Total Fibre and color. All of these equations were developed using
clean, whole grain samples and have R2 values ranging between 0.89
to 0.98. By creating robust equations using the correct samples, it is possible
to have accurate and repeatable equations that can stand up over time. The
future of NIRS is promising. NIRS has
shown potential in the areas of barley phytate, water sensitivity and even
genetic ‘fingerprinting’. The limits of
this technology are yet to be determined.
Lori Oatway, lori.oatway@gov.ab.ca, 403-782-8048
Analysis of the barley stem rust resistance gene Rpg1 messenger RNA.
Nils Rostoks, Brian Steffenson,
David Kudrna, Andris Kleinhofs. Washington State University, Dept. of Crop
and Soil Sciences, Pullman WA 99164-6420, USA; Dept. of Plant Pathology, 495
Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108-6030, USA
Recently, we (Brueggeman et
al. PNAS 2002, 99:9328-33) cloned the barley stem rust resistance gene Rpg1 by a map-based approach (GenBank
accession AF509748). Expression of the
gene appeared to be low with only one partial cDNA clone found among 500,000
colonies searched. To obtain a better understanding of the Rpg1 gene expression, we initiated a qualitative and quantitative
analysis of the mRNA. Different tissue types, such as green and etiolated
seedling, mature leaf, root and immature inflorescence all appeared to express
the gene as judged by RT-PCR and Northern blot techniques. Quantification of
the Rpg1 mRNA upon infection with Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici and in different tissues using
real time RT-PCR is in progress. A single transcription start site 132 bp
upstream of the Rpg1 gene translation
start was detected by 5’ RACE technique in the root and the mature leaf
tissues. Thus the total length of the Rpg1 mRNA is 2964 n. Analyses of
the promoter-containing upstream region will be presented.
Nils Rostoks, nrostoks@wsu.edu,
509-335-9692
Genetic Linkage Map of cv. Foster
x Fusarium Resistant Line CI4196.
Deric Schmierer1, David
Kudrna2, Thomas Drader1, and Andris Kleinhofs3.
1Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, Washington State
University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA; 2Plant Genomics Institute,
Dept. of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0036, USA; 3School
of Molecular Biosciences and Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, Washington
State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420, USA
A population of 144 recombinant
inbred lines (RILs) from a cross between barley cv. Foster and a Fusarium resistant line CI4196 was used
to construct a genetic linkage map.
Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphic markers were used primarily and
include: known function genes, genomic
DNA, resistance gene analogs (RGA), and cDNA and EST clones. A skeletal map consisting of 106 loci
covering 1,124 cM has been completed.
This map still contains 12 gaps over 20 cM. The goal is to create a skeletal map with a marker approximately
every 10cM. The map will be used to map
Fusarium resistance QTL.
Andris Kleinhofs, andyk@wsu.edu (509)335-4389
Effects of deoxynivalenol on
detached barley leaf segments. Seeland, T.M., Bushnell, W.R., and
D.E. Krueger. USDA-ARS Cereal Disease Laboratory and Department of Plant
Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul MN 55108.
Deoxynivalenol (DON) is known to
be a potent inhibitor of protein synthesis and has been implicated as a
virulence factor for development of Fusarium graminearum in Fusarium head
blight (FHB). From histological observations of diseased tissues, we postulate
that DON contributes to the necrotrophic phase of FHB development. However, the
physiological role of DON in pathogenesis is largely unknown. As a first step toward understanding
effects of DON, we are using uninfected barley leaf segments to assess cytological and physiological effects of the
toxin on green tissues. We partially stripped the abaxial epidermis from
detached Robust leaf segments (1.2 cm long) and floated them with stripped
mesophyll in contact with aqueous DON solutions at 30-200 ppm. When incubated in light (150-450 μmol m-2
s-1 ), tissues on DON (at
all tested concentrations) usually turned white within 48-72 hr from loss of
chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments. In
darkness, DON-treated tissues remained green.
As viewed by transmission electron microscopy, DON induced a
characteristic increase in spacing of thylakoid chloroplast membranes in light, but not in
darkness. In both light and dark,
however, DON markedly increased loss of electrolytes from tissues as measured
by electrical conductivity of incubating solutions. This indicates that DON had
a detrimental effect on plant cell plasma membranes, causing loss of
electrolytes. In summary, DON in leaves mimicked effects of Fusarium
head blight in heads by causing loss of chloroplast pigments (although only in
the light) and by causing other degenerative changes (in light and dark). The
results support the hypothesis that DON toxicity has a role in pathogenesis.
W. R. Bushnell, billb@cdl.umn.edu, 612-625-7781
Can
Molecular Breeding Overcome Yield Ceilings in Western Two-Row Malting Barley? D.A. Schmierer, A.
Kleinhofs, S.E. Ullrich, D.A. Kudrna, V.A. Jitkov, B.L. Jones*; Washington
State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6420; * USDA-ARS, Madison, WI 53705-2334
Click here for this article
Evaluation of the National Small Grains Collection of barley for resistance to
Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation. L.G. Skoglund and
J.L. Menert. Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc. Fort Collins, CO. 80524
A total of
7,475 barley accessions from the USDA-ARS,
National Small Grains Collection, Aberdeen, Idaho, were evaluated in 1998 for
resistance to Fusarium head blight (FHB) and deoxynivalenol (DON)
accumulation. Selections were made and
advanced for further testing in 1999, 2000 and 2001. Disease evaluations were carried out in the field with natural
inoculum at locations in North Dakota and Minnesota. Additional screening was carried out in greenhouses in
Colorado. Accessions were evaluated for
percent FHB and ppm DON. The six-rowed
barley accession Chevron (CIho 1111) and the two-rowed barley accessions
Svanhals (CIho 2274) and Svansota (CIho 1907), which had previously been
identified as resistant, continued to show good levels of resistance to both
FHB and DON accumulation. Other
accessions were identified for use by barley breeding programs.
Linnea G. Skoglund, linnea.Skoglund@anheuser-busch.com,
970 472-2332
Reactions of Barley Cultivars to Fusarium Head
Blight (Fusarium graminearum) in Western Canada. J. R. Tucker1, W.
G. Legge1, M. Savard2, M. C. Therrien1, A.
Tekauz3, B. G. Rossnagel4, B. L. Harvey5, E.
Lefol4, D. Voth4 and T. Zatorski4. 1Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Research Centre, Brandon, MB; 2AAFC
Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Ottawa, ON; 3AAFC Cereal
Research Centre, Winnipeg, MB; 4Crop Development Centre, University
of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK; and 5Dept. Plant Sciences, University
of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Fusarium head blight (FHB)
has recently emerged as the most devastating barley disease in western
Canada. The objective of the present
study was to evaluate disease reactions on a set of 82 new and current western
Canadian barley cultivars in a FHB disease nursery at Brandon, MB, for 2000 and
2001. Barley rows were artificially
inoculated with corn infected with Fusarium graminearum, and visually
scored for disease reaction 2-3 weeks following heading. DON (deoxynivalenol) levels were assessed
for each cultivar using the ELISA method.
FHB reactions on the cultivar set were also visually assessed in a
disease nursery at Hangzhou, China. On
average, two-row barley showed more resistance than six-row barley for both FHB
rating and DON content. Hulless
cultivars showed a decrease in DON content in comparison with covered
cultivars. All correlations between
measured disease parameters were statistically significant, with the strongest
relationship observed between DON content in 2000 and 2001 (r = 0.86). All cultivars tested showed FHB symptoms and
accumulated DON, but a broad range of reactions was observed. Several moderately resistant cultivars were
identified.
J. R.
Tucker jtucker@agr.gc.ca (204) 726-7650
An Alberta
perspective on Fusarium head blight. T.K. Turkington1, R.M.
Clear2, J. Calpas3, and J.P. Tewari4. 1Lacombe Res.
Centre, Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB, Canada; 2Canadian
Grain Commission, Grain Res. Laboratory, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 3Alberta
Agric., Food and Rural Dev., Pest Risk Management Unit, Edmonton, AB, Canada; 4Univ.
of Alberta, Faculty of Agric., Forestry & Home Econ., Edmonton, AB, Canada.
The
continued westward appearance of Fusarium
graminearum (F.g.) in the
Canadian Prairie Provinces has occurred over the last several years, with this
pathogen becoming well established in southeastern Saskatchewan (SK), causing
cereal yield and grade losses.
Awareness of Fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by F.g. in Alberta (AB) has increased as a result of popular farm
press articles, chemical advertisements, and extension efforts. The risk of FHB in AB has been looked at
from the perspective of the disease triangle.
Currently, all cereal varieties are susceptible to FHB, but vary in
their level of susceptibility, while many of the same varieties are grown
across the three Prairie Provinces.
Surveys conducted by several organizations since 1994 have indicated
that F.g. is not a common pathogen in
cereal grain and residue, and grass residue.
Concerns have been expressed surrounding further introduction and spread
of this pathogen via infected seed and ascospore production from spilled
infected feed grain. Although July
temperatures in central and northern areas of AB can be 3-4oC lower
compared with epidemic areas in Manitoba (MB), these differences decrease for
the central regions of western MB and eastern SK. Moreover, several reports indicate the potential for FHB at lower
temperatures. In contrast, central and
northern AB tend to have similar or even higher rainfall compared with
locations in MB and SK. Efforts are
underway to gain a better understanding of the potential of FHB caused by F.g. in AB, create awareness, and
recommend management strategies to slow down FHB caused by F.g. until more effective control options become available.
T.K.
Turkington, turkingtonk@agr.gc.ca, (403) 782-8138.
Mapping Quantitative Stripe
Rust Resistance in a Large Doubled Haploid Population of Barley. Vales, M. Isabel1;
Hayes, Patrick M1; Castro, Ariel1; Corey, Ann1;
Mundt, Chris2; Capettini, Flavio3; Vivar, Hugo3;
Sandoval-Islas, Sergio4; Schoen, Chris5.1Dept. of Crop and Soil
Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR;2Dept. of Botany
and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR;3ICARDA/CIMMYT
Barley Program, Apdo 6-641, Mexico, DF Mexico;4Instituto de
Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Texcoco, Mexico;5University
of Hohenheim, State Plant Breeding Institute, Stuttgart, Germany.
Genetic resistance to barley stripe rust can be
qualitatively or quantitatively inherited. The use of qualitative sources of
resistance alone is risky because there is evidence that pathogen virulence can
evolve more quickly than plant breeders can deploy single resistance genes in
new varieties. Quantitative resistance, alone or in combination with
qualitative resistance, is in general more durable and is a key consideration
in disease resistance breeding. A large (n=409) barley doubled haploid
population was developed from the cross: BCD47 x Baronesse. BCD47 is a doubled
haploid selection developed by molecular marker-assisted pyramiding of stripe
rust resistant alleles at quantitative trait loci (QTL) on chromosomes 4 and 7.
Baronesse is the most widely grown barley variety in the Pacific Northwest and
it is quite susceptible to barley stripe rust. The goal of this project is to
identify genetic factors that influence stripe rust resistance. So far, QTL
analysis allowed to identify genetic factors affecting quantitative stripe rust
resistance on several chromosomes, the main QTL are on chromosomes 3, 4, 6 and
7. Further genotypic and phenotypic studies will allow to better estimate the
effect of population size on the estimation of QTL number, effects, and its
interactions with each other and with the environment.
M. Isabel Vales Isabel.Vales@orst.edu (541) 737-3539
Summary of
QTL Analyses of the Seed Dormancy Trait in Barley S.E. Ullrich, F. Han, W. Gao, D. Prada*, J.
Clancy, A. Kleinhofs, I. Romagosa*, J.L. Molina-Cano*, D.A. Schmierer. Washington
State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6420; * Univ. de Lleida-IRTA, 25198 Lleida,
Spain
Moderate
seed dormancy is desirable in barley, but the trait is difficult to manipulate
in breeding because of complex inheritance and large environmental effects.
Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping has shed light on genes involved and has
opened the way for further genetic study and marker-assisted breeding. QTL
analyses [MapMaker-QTL (3) or MQTL (10)] for the seed dormancy trait in barley
have been performed on the North American Barley Genome Project doubled haploid
line (DHL) mapping populations of ‘Steptoe’ (dormant) / ‘Morex’ (S/M) and
‘Harrington’ / TR306 (dormant) (H/TR), as well as, a DHL population from
‘Triumph’ (dormant) / Morex (T/M).
Germination percentage after various after-ripening periods (0 – 30 d)
was used to measure the expression of dormancy.
Major
dormancy QTL regions attributed to Steptoe from the S/M cross were identified
near the centromere (SD1, 50% variation explained) and long arm telomere (SD2,
15% variation explained) on chromosome 7(5H), and minor QTLs attributed to
Steptoe (5% variation explained each) were identified on chromosomes 1(7H) and
4 (4H), Table 1 (1, 6, 11, 12). Fine mapping efforts using a substitution
mapping method with molecular marker assisted backcross generated isogenic lines
have resolved SD1 into a 4.4 from 8.7 cM region (2) and SD2 into a 0.8 from 9.0
cM region (Gao, Kleinhofs, Ullrich, unpublished). From the H/TR cross,
putatively, a major QTL from TR306 was identified near the chromosome 7 (5H)
long arm telomere (58% variation explained) and a minor QTL from Harrington was
found on chromosome 5 (1H) (9% variation explained), Table 1 (9). Takeda (9)
measured germinations of 86 and 40% for Harrington and TR306, respectively.
Repeat of this analysis based on growthroom grown material verified these QTL
results. Although, Harrington and TR306 had 0 d after-ripening germinations of
78 and 85%, respectively, with a range of 19-100% for the mapping population
(Clancy and Ullrich, unpublished). From the T/M cross, a major dormancy QTL
from Triumph was identified near the centromere of chromosome 7 (5H) (24%
variation explained) and minor QTLs were indicated near the centromere, on the
short arm, and long arm of chromosomes 2 (2H), 5 (1H), and 7 (5H), respectively
(6-9% variation explained), Table 1 (Prada, Romagosa, Ullrich un-published).
Several
of the QTL identified in the various different mapping populations could be the
same or closely linked. The major dormancy QTL attributed to Triumph near the
centromere of chromosome 7 (5H) is likely the same as SD1, the major QTL
attributed to Steptoe based on common markers on the maps from the two crosses.
Potentially the chromosome 5 (1H) QTLs identified from the H/TR and T/M crosses
are the same. However, the chromosome 7 (5H) QTLs near the long arm telomere
identified from S/M (SD2) and T/M are probably not the same, but linked, since
the dormancy allele is from Steptoe in the S/M cross, and from Morex in the T/M
cross. On the other hand, the dormancy QTL from TR306, which is also near the
telomere of chromosome 7 (5H), could be same as either one of the Steptoe or
Morex QTLs identified in that region.
Table 1.
Summary of barley seed dormancy QTLs detected from three crosses.
Cross/Chrom. Map Interval1 Test % Var. Parent
w/ Express. in Refer.
Stat. Dor. Allele Environ.
7 (5H) Ale –
ABC324 23a 50 Steptoe All 2,
6, 11, 12
7 (5H) MWG851D – 5a 15 Steptoe All 6,
11, 12
MWG851B
1 (7H) Amy2 – Ubi1 3a 5 Steptoe
Some 6, 11, 12
4 (4H) MG622 –
BCD402B 2a 5 Steptoe
Some 6, 11, 12
7 (5H)
ABC622-ABC718 28a 58 TR306
One 9
5 (1H) N I 3a 9
Harrington One 9
7 (5H) E32M49e - 131b 24 Triumph
All Unpub.
Bmac96
7 (5H) E32M49o - 46b 9 Morex
Some Unpub.
E39M49b
5 (1H) GM521 – 28b 6 Morex
Some Unpub.
E32M59d
2 (2H) Vrs1 – Bmag125 27b 6 Morex Some Unpub.
1 Distance
between markers in table order: 4.4, 0.8, 16.0, 29.1, 3.0, 9.3, 18.0, 11.0 cM.
N I Not indicated.
a LOD
score; MapMaker-QTL (3); LOD of 2.0 sig. @ p< 0.001.
b SIM; MQTL
(10); threshold significance at p< 0.05. Only QTLs with coincident
peaks from SIM and sCIM analyses are included.
Further
study of the S/M dormancy QTLs indicate that additivity, epistasis (QTL x QTL
interaction), QTL x environment interaction, and potentially cytoplasmic
effects occur among the QTLs (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9). Based on an F2 backcross
population, SD1 appears to segregate as a single Mendelian gene, but with
environmental and potentially modifier gene effects (2). Based on time-course
studies from anthesis through grain-filling, maturity and after-ripening, the
S/M QTLs seem to act to maintain/release dormancy after maturity and during
after-ripening and are not to be involved in the inception of dormancy (6).
Another
potential QTL or major gene that conditions dormancy may be located on chromosome
6 (6H). A set of F5 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) were developed
from a cross of the near isogenic lines; Triumph (dormant) and TL43, a
non-dormant sodium azide induced mutant of Triumph (4). Subsets of dormant and
non-dormant lines were used for bulk segregant analysis with 60 RFLPs, SSRs,
and STSs distributed across the seven barley chromosomes . Differences between
the parents and between the respective dormant and non-dormant RILs were only
detected in the centromere region of chromosome 6 (6H). Since the TL43 mutant
also shows reduced sensitivity to ABA (7), it is hypothesized that the putative
chromosome 6 gene is involved in hormonal regulation of germination. Study is
underway to further characterize this mutant gene.
21. Han, F.,
S.E. Ullrich, J.A., Clancy, V. Jitkov, A. Kilian, and I. Romagosa. 1996.
Verification of barley seed dormancy loci via linked molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:87-91.
22. Han, F.,
S.E. Ullrich, J.A. Clancy, and I. Romagosa.1999. Inheritance and fine mapping
of a major barley seed dormancy QTL. Plant Science 143:113-118.
23. Lander,
E.S. and D. Botstein. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative
traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185-199.
24. Larson,
S., G. Bryan, W. Dyer, and T. Blake. 1996. Evaluating gene effects of a major
barley seed dormancy QTL in reciprocal backcross populations. J. QTL.
Available: J. Agric. Genomics : http://www.ncgr.org/jag/papers96/
paper496/larson15a.html.
25. Molina-Cano,
J.L., A. Sopena, J.S. Swanston, A.M. Casas, M.A. Moralejo, A. Ubieto, I. Lara,
A.M. Perez-Vendrell, and I. Romagosa. 1999. A mutant induced in the malting
barley cv Triumph with reduced dormancy and ABA response. Theor. Appl. Genet.
98:347-355.
26. Oberthur,
L., T.K. Blake, W.E. Dyer, and S.E. Ullrich.
1995. Genetic analysis of seed dormancy in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J. QTL. available: J. Agric. Genomics :
http://www.ncgr.org/jag/papers95/paper596/index595.html.
27. Romagosa,
I., F. Han, J.A. Clancy, and S.E. Ullrich. 1999. Individual locus effects on
dormancy during seed development and after-ripening in barley. Crop Sci. 39:
74-79.
28. Romagosa,
I., D. Prada, M.A. Moralejo, A. Sopena, P. Muñoz, A.M. Casas, J.S. Swanston,
and J.L. Molina-Cano. 2001. Dormancy, ABA content and sensitivity to exogenous ABA
application of a barley mutant during seed development and after ripening. J.
Exp. Bot. 52:1499-1506.
29. Takeda, K.
1996. Varietal variation and inheritance of seed dormancy in barley. p.
205-212. In K. Noda and D.J. Mares
(ed.). Pre-harvest sprouting in cereals
1995. Center for Academic Societies,
Osaka, Japan.
30. Tinker,
N.A. and D.E. Mather. 1995. MQTL: Software for simplified composite interval
mapping of QTL in multiple environments. J. QTL available: J. Agric. Genomics
: http://www.ncgr.org/jag/papers95/paper295/index295.html.
31. Ullrich,
S.E., F. Han, T.K. Blake, L.E. Oberthur, W.E. Dyer, and J.A. Clancy. 1996. Seed
dormancy in barley. Genetic resolution and relationship to other traits. p. 157-163.
In K. Noda and D.J. Mares
(ed.). Pre-harvest sprouting in cereals
1995. Center for Academic Societies,
Osaka, Japan.
32. Ullrich,
S. E., P. M. Hayes, W. E. Dyer, T. K. Blake, and J. A. Clancy. 1993.
Quantitative trait locus analysis of seed dormancy in "Steptoe"
barley. p. 136-145. In: M. K.
Walker-Simmons and J. L. Reid (eds.) Preharvest sprouting in cereals 1992. Amer.Assoc. Cereal Chemist, St. Paul.
S.E. Ullrich, Ullrich@wsu,edu, 509-335-4936
Phenotypic
Associative Microsatellite (SSR) Marker Assisted Selection. L. J. Wright, D. B. Cooper, BARI Ft. Collins CO.; P. Hayes,
OSU, Corvallis, OR.
In
a joint project between Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc. and Oregon State
University, seventy-seven SSR markers were assayed on 192 6-rowed and two-rowed
BARI malting barley lines using either an ABI 377 or ABI 3700 Automated
Sequencer. The lines tested included
elite BARI experimentals and North American malting varieties. These lines were ranked from 1 – 9 (low to
high) for thirty traits, including malting quality and DON. Marker data were then sorted according to
the phenotypic ranking for each trait.
High and low rankings for the phenotypic trait were then compared to the
SSR database to determine if an association could be made for each SSR marker.
Many phenotypic associative SSR markers were made for both agronomic and
malting traits. When associative
markers for five malting barley characteristics were compared to malting QTLs
there was good agreement between the two.
Les
Wright, Les.Wright@Anheuser-Busch.com,
(970) 473-2326
Cultivar resistance to scald of barley in Alberta from 1997 to 2001. K. Xi1, T.K. Turkington2, M. Cortez1,
J. Helm1, P. Juskiw1 and J. Nyachiro1. 1Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural
Development, Field Crop Development Centre. Lacombe, AB. T4L 1W1; 2Agriculture
and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research Centre, Lacombe, AB. T4L 1W1
Cultivar resistance to scald caused by Rhynchosporium secalis (Oud) J.J. Davis was evaluated in field hill plots across Alberta, Canada, from 1997 to 1999
as the first period, and from 2000 to 2001as the second period. The barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) used consisted of commercial cultivars with different levels of
resistance or susceptibility and cultivars with major resistance genes that have been used as differentials worldwide. Consistently highly
to intermediate resistant reactions in the differentials suggest that R. secalis pathotypes were similar for the differentials during the two test periods.
Resistance in few commercial cultivars including AC Stacey, CDC Dolly, Kasota, Mahigan and Seebe, held up at all locations during the entire test period.
Cultivars previously considered as resistant were found to be intermediate in reaction in the first period and became susceptible in the second period,
indicating the resistance was completely overcome by the occurrence of virulent pathotypes. In addition, most commercial cultivars tended to display relatively
more susceptible reactions in the second period compared with that in the first one. Scald reaction of commercial cultivars was significantly different among site
and season, and pathotype distribution was considerably different among sites. Consequently, scald management via the selection of cultivar will be dependent
on location.
K. Xi, kequan.xi@gov.ab.ca, (403) 782-8100 ext 260,
Genetic structure of Rhynchosporium secalis in Alberta. J. Zantinge, J. Hillson and K.
Xi. Alberta Agriculture, Field Crop Development Centre, 6000 C & E Trail, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
Amplified fragment
length polymorphism (AFLP) markers were used to determine the genetic diversity
and structure of Alberta field populations of Rhynchosporium secalis. In the first study, 14 representative
isolates generally segregated according to cultivar origin in the resulting
UPMGA dendrogram based on AFLP markers.
The second study using 110 isolates revealed a highly divergent R. secalis population with many clads and similarity coefficients
ranging from 0.56 to 1.00. The
population subdivided weakly according to location and pathotype. The Westlock and Beaverlodge sites that had
less virulent scald races shared greater genotypic similarity while the Trochu
site with more virulent scald races had greater genotypic variation. The highly divergent fingerprints and
clustering from some moderately resistant varieties support the theory that
“new” resistant varieties select for increased variation and virulence in the R. secalis populations.
J.
Zantinge Jennifer.zantinge@gov.ab.ca,
403-782-8100.