Races of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. hordei
in the
Xianming Chen
USDA-ARS and
Department of Plant Pathology,
Virulences of
Puccinia striiformis Westend. f. sp. hordei (PSH) Eriks.,
the causal agent of stripe rust of barley, have been studied since the pathogen
was first detected in southern
The standard
procedures were used to identify races of P.
striiformis f. sp. hordei (Chen
et al. 1995). Stripe rust samples from barley and grasses
were used to inoculate Steptoe, susceptible to all P. striiformis f. sp. hordei
isolates, for increasing urediniospores.
Fresh urediniospores were used to inoculate 2-leaf stage seedlings of
the 12 barley genotypes used to differentiate races of P. striiformis f. sp. hordei
in a mixture with talc powdery at about 1:20 ratio. Inoculated plants were kept in a dew chamber
without light at 10oC for 24 h and then placed in a growth chamber with
16/8 h (light/dark) at a diurnal temperature cycle gradually changing from 4oC
at 2:00 am to 20oC at 2:00 pm.
Infection types based on a 0-9 scale were recorded 18 to 22 days after
inoculation. Infection types 0-5 (mostly
0-3) were considered avirulent for the isolate (resistant for the barley differential
genotype) and 6-9 (mostly 8-9) were considered virulent for the isolate
(susceptible for the differential genotype).
In 2004, 42
isolates were obtained, of which 20 were from
In 2005, 32
isolates were obtained from
In 2006, 44
isolates were obtained, of which 12 were from
In 2007, only
9 isolates were successfully obtained, 3 from
So far, a
total of 81 races have been identified for the P. striiformis f. sp. hordei.
Over the four years, a total of 128 isolates were tested and 30 races were
detected. The results indicate a great diversity of races in the stripe rust
population. The most predominant race
was PSH-71, accounting for 22% of the isolates.
The race is virulent on 9 of the 12 differential genotypes. The predominance of the relatively high
virulent race was in contrast to the situation before 2004 when relatively low virulent
races were predominant (Chen 2004).
During the
four years of this study, stripe rust was relatively light in the states where
the disease occurred compared to the epidemics in the middle to late
1990s. The less severe stripe rust of
barley was in contrast to the severe epidemics of wheat stripe rust caused by P. striiformis f. sp. tritici, especially in 2005 (Chen 2007).
The less severe stripe rust damage
during this period was due to growing resistant cultivars, use of fungicides,
and reduced barley acreage in many states.
The most popular barley cultivar, Baronesse,
which has a moderate level of non-race specific high-temperature, adult-plant
(HTAP) resistance, has contributed significantly to the reduced rust inoculum pressure, especially in the
The isolate
from a barley breeding line in
References:
Chen,
X. M. 2004. Epidemiology of barley
stripe rust and races of Puccinia
striiformis f.
sp. hordei: the first decade in the
Bulletin 32: online: [www.crpmb.org/]2004/1029chen.
Chen, X. M.
2007. Challenges and solutions for stripe
rust control in the
Australian J. of Agric. Res. 58:648-655.
Chen,
X. M., Line, R. F., and Leung, H. 1995. Virulence and polymorphic DNA
relationships of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. hordei
to other rusts. Phytopathology
85:1335-1342.
Line, R. F., and Chen, X. M. 1996. Wheat and barley stripe rust in
Line,
R. F., and Chen, X. M. 1999. Control and epidemiology of
barley stripe rust in
July
11-15, 1999.
Table 1. Races of Puccinia
striiformis f. sp. hordei and
their frequencies and distributions in the
|
|
PSH |
|
First
year |
No
of |
Frequency |
Distribution |
|
Year |
race |
Virulence
formulaa |
detected |
isolates |
(%) |
Stateb (No) |
|
2004 |
PSH-19 |
1,3,5,6,7,8 |
1995 |
1 |
2.4 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-22 |
1,4,7,8,9,10 |
1995 |
1 |
2.4 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-33 |
1,7 |
1996 |
1 |
2.4 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-35 |
1,4,7 |
1996 |
2 |
4.8 |
CA(2) |
|
|
PSH-45 |
1,3,4,6,7,8 |
1996 |
1 |
2.4 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-46 |
1,7,8 |
1996 |
1 |
2.4 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-52 |
1,5,7,8 |
1998 |
1 |
2.4 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-56 |
1,5,7,8,12 |
2001 |
4 |
9.5 |
CA(1),
WA(3) |
|
|
PSH-60 |
1,5,7,8,9,10,12 |
2001 |
4 |
9.5 |
CA(2),
WA(2) |
|
|
PSH-64 |
1,5,7,8,10,12 |
2002 |
5 |
11.9 |
CA(3),
ID(1), WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-65 |
1,2,3,4,7,8,12 |
2002 |
1 |
2.4 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-69 |
1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 |
2003 |
1 |
2.4 |
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-70 |
1,7,10,12 |
2004 |
1 |
2.4 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-71 |
1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2004 |
14 |
33.3 |
CA(6),
ID(2), WA(6) |
|
|
PSH-72 |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 |
2004 |
4 |
9.5 |
CA(1),
ID(1), OR(2) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2005 |
PSH-33 |
1,7 |
1984 |
3 |
10.0 |
CA(2),
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-46 |
1,7,8 |
1991 |
1 |
3.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-48 |
1 |
1992 |
1 |
3.3 |
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-51 |
1,5,7 |
1998 |
1 |
3.3 |
OR(1) |
|
|
PSH-52 |
1,5,7,8 |
1998 |
1 |
3.3 |
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-56 |
1,5,7,8,12 |
2001 |
8 |
26.7 |
CA(1),
ID(2), MT(5) |
|
|
PSH-59 |
1,7,8,11,12 |
2001 |
1 |
3.3 |
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-60 |
1,5,7,8,9,10,12 |
2001 |
3 |
10.0 |
ID(1),
WA(2) |
|
|
PSH-63 |
1,3,5,7,8,12 |
2002 |
2 |
6.7 |
ID(1),
MT(1) |
|
|
PSH-64 |
1,5,7,8,10,12 |
2002 |
1 |
3.3 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-65 |
1,2,3,4,7,8,12 |
2002 |
1 |
3.3 |
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-69 |
1,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 |
2003 |
2 |
6.7 |
ID(2) |
|
|
PSH-71 |
1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2004 |
3 |
10.0 |
CA(1),
WA(2) |
|
|
PSH-73 |
1,5,7,8,9 |
2005 |
2 |
6.7 |
CA(1),
ID(1) |
|
|
PSH-74 |
1,5,7,12 |
2005 |
2 |
6.7 |
CA(2)
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2006 |
PSH-1 |
1,2 |
1993 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-33 |
1,7 |
1996 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-36 |
1,4 |
1996 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-48 |
1 |
1997 |
2 |
4.5 |
CA(2) |
|
|
PSH-52 |
1,5,7,8 |
1998 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-56 |
1,5,7,8,12 |
2001 |
2 |
4.5 |
WA(2) |
|
|
PSH-60 |
1,5,7,8,9,10,12 |
2001 |
3 |
6.8 |
CA(1),
OR(1), WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-63 |
1,3,5,7,8,12 |
2002 |
1 |
2.3 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-71 |
1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2004 |
10 |
22.7 |
CA(4),
OR(3), WA(3) |
|
|
PSH-72
|
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 |
2004 |
1 |
2.3 |
AZ(1) |
|
|
PSH-75 |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2006 |
10 |
22.7 |
AZ(8),
WA(2) |
|
|
PSH-76 |
1,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2006 |
4 |
9.1 |
CA(4) |
|
|
PSH-77 |
1,3,5,7,8,9,10,12 |
2006 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-78 |
1,2,4,5,6,7,8,12 |
2006 |
3 |
6.8 |
AZ(3) |
|
|
PSH-79 |
1,2,4,5,7,8,9,10,12 |
2006 |
1 |
2.3 |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-80 |
1,5,7,10 |
2006 |
1 |
2.3 |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-81 |
1,7,10 |
2006 |
1 |
2.3 |
MN(1) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2007 |
PSH-33 |
1,7 |
1996 |
5 |
55.6% |
CA(2),
CO(3) |
|
|
PSH-46 |
1,7,8 |
1996 |
1 |
11.1% |
CO(1) |
|
|
PSH-52 |
1,5,7,8 |
1998 |
1 |
11.1% |
CA(1) |
|
|
PSH-64 |
1,5,7,8,10,12 |
2002 |
1 |
11.1% |
WA(1) |
|
|
PSH-71 |
1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,12 |
2004 |
1 |
11.1% |
WA(1) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
9 |
|
|
a Differentials: 1 = Topper, 2 = Heils
Franken, 3 = Emir, 4 = Astrix, 5 = Hiproly, 6 = Varunda, 7 = Abed
Binder
12, 8 = Trumpf, 9 = Mazurk,
10 = Bigo, 11 = I 5, and 12 = Bancroft.
b
AZ =