GENETIC ANALYSIS OF INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN PATHOVARS OF Xanthomonas campestris (Pammel) Dowson BY HOST RANGE, PLASMIDS, AND RESTRICTION FRAGMENT-LENGTH POLYMORPHISM
GERARD RAYMOND LAZO
May, 1987
Xanthomonas campestris is always found in association with plants. Those X. campestris which are known to be pathogenic are differentiated into 123 pathovars (pathogenic variants), on the basis of limited pathogenicity tests. Some members of a pathovar may have a broader host range than others, since exhaustive pathogenicity testing is impractical. Other than these tests, there is no definitive means of classifying an unknown X. campestris isolate. Those X. campestris which are not pathogenic are unclassifiable by the pathovar system, yet they may exhibit similar host range specificity to those which are pathogenic. This work was conducted in efforts to better understand the variability of X. campestris.
Over 115 strains of X. campestris were examined for plasmid content and restriction endonuclease profiles. Of the 26 pathovars examined, only 13 were found to contain plasmids. Restriction endonuclease digests of plasmid DNAs from strains within a given plasmid-containing pathovar gave surprisingly similar, but not always identical, digestion profiles by agarose gel electrophoresis. All 60 strains tested of X. campestris pvs. glycines, malvacearum, phaseoli, and vignicola could be accurately identified by pathovar from determination of the restriction fragment profile and/or by Southern hybridizations of that profile with a selected DNA probe. In no instance was the same plasmid profile seen in more than one pathovar. The apparent stability of the plasmids provides a natural genetic marker that can be strain specific and perhaps useful in epidemiological investigations.
Cloned DNA fragments, derived from a cosmid library of a Florida isolate of X. campestris pv. citri strain 3041, were used to detect restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of total DNA from 87 strains of X. campestris, comprising 23 different pathovars. Autoradiographs of Southern transfers of genomic DNA probed with cosmid-sized clones revealed hybridization profiles which appeared to be highly conserved. The hybridization patterns observed between different pathovars suggested that some DNA fragments were conserved at the species level, others were conserved at the pathovar level, and still others were variable. The degree of variability appeared to depend on the DNA probe used. By using more than one DNA probe, or by digesting the genomic DNAs with different restriction endonucleases, all of the strains of X. campestris described as belonging to a given pathovar could be differentiated. All strains of X. campestris were readily grouped by RFLP phenotypes, and the classification based on RFLP patterns correlated well with the classification based on pathogenicity. Although certain pathovars may need to be redefined, this work supports and helps validate the natural taxonomic groupings provided by the pathovar naming system.
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Chairman: Dean W. Gabriel, Major Department: Plant Pathology
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
HOST RANGE OF PATHOVARS OF XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Bacterial Strains and Host Plants
- Plant Inoculations
- Biochemical Differentiation
- Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
- Results
- Pathogenicity Tests
- Biochemical Differentiation
- Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis
- Discussion
CONSERVATION OF PLASMID DNA SEQUENCES AND PATHOVAR IDENTIFICATION OF STRAINS OF XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS
* This chapter contains copyrighted material from the journal Phytopathology which was authorized for use in this dissertation.
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Bacterial Strains
- Plasmid Extraction and Visualization
- Cloning of Plasmid
- Restriction Endonuclease Fragments
- DNA/DNA Hybridization
- Results
- Detection of Plasmid DNA
- Restriction Endonuclease Profiles
- DNA/DNA Hybridization
- Dot-blot Hybridization
- Discussion
ARE RACE-SPECIFIC AVIRULENCE GENES ENCODED BY PLASMIDS OF XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS PV. MALVACEARUM?
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Bacterial Strains and Host Plants
- Plant Inoculations
- Plasmid Analysis
- Plasmid Curing
- Race Specificity Determinants
- Plasmid Origin of Replication and Mobilization
- Results
- Plasmid and Race-Specificity
- Plasmid Curing
- Race Specificity Determinants
- Plasmid Origin of Replication and Mobilization
- Discussion
PATHOVARS OF XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS ARE DISTINGUISHABLE BY RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM
* This chapter contains copyrighted material from International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology which was authorized for use in this dissertation.
SUMMARY
- Intraspecific Variation
- Plasmids
- Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism .
- Conclusions
LITERATURE CITED
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
LIST OF TABLES
- 3-1 Strains of X. campestris Used in Host Range Investigation
- 3-2 Legume Plant Reactions to Inoculation with Pathovars
of X. campestris
- 3-3 Host Range Observed for Pathovars of X. campestris
Pathogenic to Legume Host Plants
- 3-4 Malvaceous Plant Reactions to Inoculation with Strains of
X. campestris pv. malvacearum
- 3-5 Biochemical Reactions of Strains of X. campestris
- 4-1 Strains of X. campestris Used for Plasmid Analysis
- 4-2 Detection of Plasmid DNA in Strains of X. campestris
- 4-3 Hybridization of Radiolabeled Plasmid Probes to Total DNA of Pathovars of X. campestris
- 5-1 Strains of X. campestris pv. malvacearum Used in
Race-specificity investigation
- 5-2 Plasmid Groupings and Cotton Plant Reactions to Strains of
X. campestris pv. malvacearum
- 5-3 Sizes of Plasmid EcoRI Fragments in X. campestris
pv. malvacearum
- 5-4 Pathogenicity of X. campestris pv. malvacearum
Transconjugants on Cotton Host Differentials
- 5-5 Selection of Plasmid Replication Genes in X. campestris
pv. malvacearum strain X
- 6-1 Strains of X. campestris Used for Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis
- 6-2 Size of DNA Fragments from X. campestris Genomic Digests Which Hybridized to the XCT1 DNA Probe. See Figure 4.3
- 6-3 Size of DNA Fragments from X. campestris Genomic Digests Which Hybridized to the XCT1 DNA Probe. See Figure 4.5
LIST OF FIGURES
- 3-1 SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis of Total Protein
From Strains of X. campestris
- 4-1 Plasmid DNAs from Strains of X. campestris pv. malvacearum Digested with Restriction Endonucleases EcoR1 and BamHI
- 4-2 Graphic Representation of Plasmid Restriction Fragment Profiles for Pathovars of X. campestris
- 4-3 Plasmid DNAs from Strains of X. campestris pv. malvacearum Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI and Hybridized to Probe N4.5
- 4-4 Plasmid DNAs from Strains of X. campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI and Hybridized to Probes P2.0 and P2.3
- 6-1 Genomic DNA of Strains of X. campestris pvs. phaseoli, alfalfae, and campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI
- 6-2 Genomic DNA of Strains From Different Pathovars of X. campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI
- 6-3 Genomic DNA of Strains of X. campestris pvs. phaseoli, alfalfae, and campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI and Hybridized with probe XCT1
- 6-4 Genomic DNA of Strains of X. campestris pvs. phaseoli, alfalfae, and campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI and Hybridized with probe XCT11
- 6-5 Genomic DNA of Strains From Different Pathovars of X. campestris Digested with Restriction Endonuclease EcoRI and Hybridized with Probe XCT1