M.C. Therrien
AAFC Brandon Research Centre
Barley Production Trends for Western
Canada 2005-2009:
The
Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) has been conducting a detailed survey of the acreage
of barley production on a cultivar basis for some time. This provides valuable
information on producer preference for cultivars and the implications on
domestic and export markets and future trends. Table 1 summarizes survey
results and represents five-year production trends and possible implications on
the future direction of barley breeding in Western Canada (WC).
Barley
is the third largest annual crop grown in WC, with wheat (all types) being
number 1, followed by canola. Barley contributes billions of dollars to the
Canadian economy annually with over 7 million acres of production annually over
the last decade.
Table
1 shows the planted acreage of barley rising from 2005 to 2007, then falling
dramatically in 2008 and 2009. Although malting varieties dominate the barley
acreage in WC, most of the barley ends up as livestock feed or forage. Only 20%
of the malting barley, on average, is bought as malt in any given year. The
remaining 80%, along with all the feed cultivars, is sold as feed or fed
on-farm as grain for livestock. As well, forage cultivars are used exclusively
as fodder for cattle. The relatively small acreage of hulless barley goes
mainly to livestock feed (c. 90%), as well, with roughly 10% of the production
going to food products. The strong downward trend in barley production is
mirrored by the other major cereals grown in
Table 1: Total Seeded Acres
of Barley –
(x ‘000 ac.)
Type |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Two-row malt |
6086 |
4279 |
5346 |
4984 |
4001 |
Six-row malt |
705 |
711 |
1013 |
1081 |
646 |
Total malt |
6791 |
4990 |
6359 |
6065 |
4647 |
Feed |
1448 |
1782 |
1980 |
764 |
454 |
Forage |
594 |
1176 |
1623 |
756 |
936 |
Hulless |
54 |
64 |
185 |
75 |
176 |
Total: |
8887 |
8012 |
10146 |
7660 |
7191 |
Future Trends in
Table
2 shows the percent of the growing area sown to the major barley types in the
last 5 years. Although there was a dip
in 2006 and 2007, two and six row malting barley combined remain the mostly
widely grown in WC. This is followed by forage barley, which has shown a
general upward trend with fluctuations tied closely with the total number of
beef cattle in WC in a given year. Hulless barley has shown a modest but steady
increase as the barley food market is slowly establishing itself in
Table 2: Percent of Barley Types Grown
in
Type |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Two-row
malt |
68.5 |
53.4 |
52.7 |
65.1 |
64.4 |
Six-row
malt |
7.9 |
8.9 |
10.0 |
14.1 |
10.4 |
Total
malt |
76.4 |
62.3 |
62.7 |
79.2 |
74.8 |
Feed |
16.3 |
22.2 |
19.5 |
10.0 |
7.3 |
Forage |
6.7 |
14.7 |
16.0 |
9.9 |
15.1 |
Hulless |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
There
are three public, and one private, breeding efforts in
WC. All have experienced some level of downsizing in recent years. As a result,
each program has had to narrow its’ focus in terms of cultivar development.
Because
of the steady and large demand, there remains a strong emphasis in developing
new two-row malting cultivars. This represents around 60% of all cultivar
development in WC. The six-row malting development effort is the next largest,
at some 20% of across-the-board activities. Unlike two-row malting barley, the
demand for six-row malting barley (in
Forage
barley cultivar development sits in third place, with around 10% of resources
devoted to this effort. Since demand for forage cultivars has been steady for
some 10 years, it is expected that this effort will not change appreciably into
the foreseeable future. Feed (non-forage) barley development activities have
been greatly reduced in the last 5 years, in parallel to the sharp drop in
demand for this type of barley. Standard fed cultivar development activities in
WC may cease in the next 3-5 years.
About
8% of cultivar development is aimed at food (hulless) barley. This endeavour is
at a crossroads because of the relatively costly nature of this enterprise and
its’ need for rare, specialized expertise. Thus, the continuation of the
programs actively involved in food barley development will be contingent on a
high enough sale volume of commercial food barley to warrant continued
investment in this effort.
The
next five years will be critical in determining the future of barley cultivar
development in