A Database for Triticeae and Avena
Clipping trials to test wheats for dual purposes aimed at establishing sustainable agrosystems.
I.J.A. del Duca and R.S. Fontaneli.
The no-till system, in addition to being a more
powerful practice to prevent soil erosion, contributes greatly
to the improvement of the physical, chemical, and biological properties
of the soil and a reduction in production costs. However, to be
feasible, the no-till system requires crop rotation and soil
maintenance with a permanent cover of vegetation.
More than 6,000,000 ha are cultivated with crops
such as soybean, corn, rice, and beans in the summer in the state
of Rio Grande do Sul (R.S.), Brazil. In contrast, less than 1,000,000
ha are cultivated with the small, winter grains (wheat, oats,
barley, triticale, and rye). This practice leaves a large area
of land idle in the winter, with extremely negative results for
the regional economy, leading to soil and revenue losses and unemployment,
Furthermore, the possibility of better using native pasture areas
in R.S.óabout 14,000,000 haóby incorporating them
more efficiently into the productive system involving the grain
crops must be contemplated.
On the other hand, in the traditional cattle-raising
regions of R.S., there is a drastic shortage of forage in the
winter months because of low temperatures. As a result, beef cattle
finishing and milk production have increased during the winter
in the middle plateau region of R.S. The need for crop rotation
and cattle production has led to activities integrating crop-cattle
production and may result in better use of farm potential.
During 1993-94, a clipping trial was carried
out at Passo Fundo including four wheat lines with longer vegetative
periods, two wheat checks (early) adapted to grain production,
two cultivars of common oats, one wild oat (Avena strigosa),
one barley, one rye, and one triticale. The trial was sown on
3 May, 1993, and 17 May, 1994, in a split-plot design with
three replications. In order to simulate cattle grazing, each
genotype was subjected to clippings (without clipping; first clipping
16 July, 1993, and 1 August, 1994; second clipping 13 August,
1993 and 25 August, 1994) 5-7 cm above the ground, when
the plants reached a height of approximately 30 cm. The genotypes
tested were: wheat (IPF 41004, IPF 55204, PF 86247, and PF 87451),
early check wheats (BR 23 and EMBRAPA 16), oat (UPF 14 and UPF
15), an A. strigosa landrace, barley (MN 599, in 1993,
and BR 2, in 1994), rye (BR 1), and triticale (BR 4).
The 1993-94 2-year averages of experimental
data from the six wheats, compared with the other small grains,
are shown in Table 4. Similarly, the effects of both one and two
clippings on dry matter and grain yield, compared to the corresponding
unclipped checks, are shown.
Table 4. Dry matter and grain yield average (kg/ha) and percent relative to the wheat
EMBRAPA 16, in the dual-purpose small grains trial during 1993-94.
______________________________________________________________________________
Cereal Dry matter Grain yield
kg/ha, % EMBRAPA 16 kg/ha, % EMBRAPA 16
__________________________________________________________
lC 2C 1C 2C WC1 1C WC1 1C
______________________________________________________________________________
Oats (UPF 14) 1,495 1,990 107 84 1,158 826 36 39
Oats (UPF 15) 1,332 2,790 95 118 1,040 1,422 32 67
Avena strigosa 1,524 2,348 109 99 222 590 7 28
Rye (BR 1) 1,754 2,343 125 99 1,829 774 57 36
Barley2 1,714 2,418 122 102 1,688 1,196 52 56
Triticale (BR4) 1,448 2,212 103 94 2,586 1,018 80 48
Wheat (IPF41004) 1,079 2,326 77 98 3,042 2,344 94 111
Wheat (IPF55204) 1,054 2,574 75 109 2,588 2,494 80 118
Wheat (PF 86247) 1,269 2,440 91 103 2,914 2,191 90 103
Wheat (PF 87451) 1,138 2,475 94 105 2,882 2,629 90 124
Wheat (BR 23) 1,327 1,958 95 83 2,474 702 77 33
wheat (EMBRAPA 16) 1,400 2,363 100 100 3,220 2,120
100 100
Average 1,393 2,353 2,137 1,526
______________________________________________________________________________
Sowing dates = 3 May, 1993, and 17 May, 1994.
1WC = without clipping; 1C (1 clipping = 16 July, 1993, and 1 August, 1994);
2C (2 clippings = 16 July, 1993 + 13 August, 1993, and 1 August, 1994 + 25 August, 1994).
2Barley MN 599 in 1993 and BR 2 om 1994.
C.V. % dry matter = 12 2 (1993), 10.9 (1994).
C.V. % grain yield = 16.0 (1993), 13.3 (1994).
The percent comparisons were made in relation to EMBRAPA 16 wheat, (the most cultivated wheat in R.S. at present and the highest-yielding wheat in each of the last 5 years). Another practical comparison could be made
relative to A. strigosa, the most cultivated
winter cereal in R.S., for providing a soil cover and forage,
especially during the autumn and winter months.
Considering the 2-year average of dry matter
production with one clipping, the best cereal species were rye
BR 1 and the barley lines, probably because of their early development,
with 1,754 kg/ha and 1,714 kg/ha, respectively. Considering the
sum of both clippings, the outstanding cereals were oat cultivar
UPF 15 (2,790 kg/ha) and the wheat lines IPF 55204 (2,574 kg/ha)
and PF 87451 (2,475 kg/ha).
No cereal surpassed the grain yield of EMBRAPA 16
(3,220 kg/ha) in the treatments without clipping for the 2-year
average. Very low grain yields were obtained with two clippings
over 2 years, probably making advancement of the sowing period
(to April) of greater importance, so that grain yield would not
be affected adversly when greater amounts of dry matter are desired.
In the treatments with one clipping, the wheats were outstanding
in relation to other cereals, especially the late early types.
The varieties PF 87451, IPF 55204, and IPF 41004 yielded 2,629,
2,494, and 2,344 kg/ha of grain, respectively. EMBRAPA 16, with
one clipping, yielded 2,120 kg/ha.
Early autumn sowing (April-May) for adequate
late-flowering germplasms makes feasible a dual-purpose
system, providing forage in the winter months without drastic
reduction in grain yield. This system can provide greater stability
to the wheat crop, when a flexible management depends on the prices
of grain or animal products.
L.J.A. del Duca, C.N.A. de Sousa, E.M. Guarienti, and W.I. Linhares.
Paraná is the most important Brazilian state
with reference to wheat production. For this reason, a nursery
including 95 cultivars and lines that were in intermediate and
final yield trials in that state in 1995 was evaluated under field
and greenhouse conditions at the Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de
Trigo, Passo Fundo, in Rio Grande do Sul. Information regarding
kernel note (KN) and disease complex on leaf (DCL) were obtained
under field conditions, with natural infection (planting 13 June,
1995). For powdery mildew (PM), some data were obtained under
artificial inoculation at the seedling stage in the greenhouse
with a mixture of races. The average coefficient of infection
(ACI) was obtained under field conditions with natural infection,
after observation in different years.
For KN, the rating varied from 1 (excellent) to 5
(very poor). For the DCL and PM, the scale ranged from 0 (immune
or without symptoms) to 5 (highly susceptible).
The nursery to evaluate effects of aluminum was seeded
on 17 July, 1995 in acid soils (pH = 4.7-5 1; Al = 3.1-4.2
me/100 g soil) with two replications. The index of susceptibility
(IS) varied from 0 50 (highly resistant) to 5.0 (highly susceptible).
Because of strong dry periods, 1995 was favorable for reinforcing
the negative effects of aluminum, leading to greater values when
compared to years with normal rainfall.
Some information for baking quality from the alveograph
method (W = deformation energy of dough) from EMBRAPA-CTAA
and EMBRAPA-CNPT in 1990-94 are presented. These data
represent the averages from a variable number of years for each
genotype.
For each characteristic, the wheats below can be
designated as outstanding:
Kernel note (< = 1+):
IA 9113. IAPAR 41, IAPAR 42, IAPAR 46, LD 9lll, PG 9337, OC 935,
OC 938, OC 9510, OC 9513, OCEPAR 21, Trigo BR 23, EMBRAPA 16,
PF 86233, PF 86242, IDS 719-2, and ORL 9285;
DCL (< = 2): CEP 24,
IA 9113, IAPAR 41, IAPAR 42, IAPAR 46, ID 9318, PG 9337, OC 956,
OC 958, OC 959, OC 9513, EMBRAPA 16, PF 86242, PF 9122, PF 9127,
PF 91204, and ORL 9285;
Aluminum tolerance (IS
< = 1.5l): IAC 5-Maringa, IAPAR 41, IAPAR 53, OC 958,
and Trigo BR 35, IS below 1.20; ORL 91274, PF 87410, and PF 88747,
IS between 1.25 and 1.38; Trigo BR 23, IAPAR 46, OC 935, and OC
956, IS between 1.42 and 1.50;
W (> = 200): CEP 24,
IA 9113, IA 948, IA 949, IA 9413, IA 9415, IA 9417, IAPAR 6, IAPAR
17, IAPAR 28, IAPAR 29, IAPAR 53, IAPAR 60, LD 9111, LD 937, OC
928, OC 935, OC 938, OC 939, OCEPAR 10, QCEPAR 16, OCEPAR 18,
OCEPAR 19, OCEPAR 21, OCEPAR 22, ORL 9128, Trigo BR 40, EMBRAPA
10, EMBRAPA 16, PF 9099, PF 9127, PF 91205, PF 91420, PF 91450,
PF 91627, Anahuac, Trigo BR 18, and IDS 723-2;
PM = IAPAR 42 and PF 87410
showed outstanding performance, considering their resistance under
greenhouse and field conditions for 3 or more years. The following
genotypes showed good performance in the year(s) and conditions:
PG 9337, OC 954, OC 9511, PF 94120, PF 91627, and ORI 92141. Considering
the ACI (< = 20 %), although they may show susceptibility in
some years or in the greenhouse, the following cultivars can be
mentioned: CEP 24, IAPAR 46, EMBRAPA 16, EMBRAPA 27, PF 86233,
PF 86242, PF 9122, PF 91204, PF 91205, and ORL 91256.
Evaluations relating only to 1995 must be interpreted
as preliminary information.
Distribution by state of the main Brazilian wheat cultivars in 1994-95.
L.J.A. del Duca and P.L. Scheeren.
As a result of political, social, and economic factors,
Brazilian wheat production has fluctuated from almost self-sufficiency
(6.1 million tons) in 1987 to the drastic reduction to nearly
1.5 million tons in 1995. However, consumption has increased to
about 8 million tons, leading to importation of most of the domestically
consumed wheat. Considering the reduction in world stocks and
price elevation in the market, an increase in area in Brazil that
can lead to 2.5 million tons of production is expected in 1996.
Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul are the states
responsible for most of Brazilian wheat production and have a
wide assortment of crop conditions, such as with or without irrigation,
presence or absence of aluminum in the soil, and good or poor
soil fertility. The commercial life span of cultivars is normally
short. Some cultivars have broad adaptation (Trigo BR 13-Terena,
Trigo BR 23, EMBRAPA 16, and CEP 24-Industrial), whereas
others are more restricted in their growing area (IAC 60, Trigo
BR 26, and Trigo BR 33).
The most important cultivated wheats, considering
the three major ones at each state are detailed in Table 5 (p.
62), with additional information regarding pedigree, soil aluminum
tolerance, and breadmaking quality. From these 16 listed genotypes,
only four are tolerant to aluminum (EMBRAPA 16, CEP 24, IAC 60,
and Trigo BR 35) and two are moderately tolerant (Trigo BR 23
and Panda). For breadmaking quality, nine cultivars are considered
very good (EMBRAPA l0, Trigo BR 17, and Trigo BR 40) or good (Anahuac
75, Trigo BR 18, EMBRAPA 16, CEP 24, OCEPAR 16, and IAC 287).
At present, EMBRAPA 16 is the most cultivated Brazilian wheat accounting for much of the production areas of the three states, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, and Paraná.
INSERT TABLE 5, Page 63.