Genetic variability correlation and Path-coefficients analysis of some quantitative and qualitative traits under deferments en

Barley Genetics Newsletter  37: 29–33 (2007)

 

Line x Tester Analysis in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Across Environments

Ambresh Kumar Verma, S.R. Vishwakarma and P.K. Singh

 

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding

Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology,

Kumarganj, Faizabad, (UP) 224 229 India.

e-mail:   ambreshv@gmail.com

Abstract

A combining ability effects study was conducted through line x tester analysis under normal fertile and saline sodic soil environments. The results indicated  the predominance of non- additive gene action for all the traits. The line Kedar and tester K-560 in normal fertile soil and tester Lakhan in saline sodic soil while RD-2552, Narendra Jau-4 and NDB-1173 under both environments proved good general combiners for seed yield and quality components characters. The crosses Kedar x K-560, K-603 x K-560, DL-88 x Lakhan and RD-2035 x K-560 in normal and RD-2552 x Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan, NDB-1173 x K-560, and RD-2624 x K-560, in saline sodic soil while RD-2552 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, BL-2 x Lakhan and Jagrati x K-560 in both environment exhibited highest sca effects for seed yield and other quality traits, showing their desirability to offer transgressive segregants in succeeding generations.

 

Key words: barley, combining ability, gene action, protein content, lysine content.

 

Introduction

Research on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) bears special significance due to its great elasticity of adaptation under various stresses and lot of potential both for domestic and industrial uses. Barley also has been very important winter cereal crop in India , because of its versatile nature, lower cost of cultivation, superior nutritional qualities and many other uses. The major uses of barley grains, however are in the production of malt, which is used to make beer, beverage industrial alcohol, whisky, malt syrups, malted milk and vinegar. The spent malt after brewing is used as feed. Combining ability analysis helps in identification of desirable parents and crosses for their further exploitation in breeding programme. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to estimate combining ability effects for yield and quality components characters and also to identify suitable parents and crosses in barley under normal fertile and saline soil environments.

 

Materials and Methods

The material consisted of 15 lines, namely RD-2552, Narendra Jau-1, Narendra Jau-2, Narendra Jau-4, RD-2035, BL-2, BH-512, Ratna, Kedar, Jagrati, DL-88, Azad, K-603, NDB-1173 and RD-2624 with 3 testers viz., Narendra Jau-3, K-560 and Lakhan crosses were attempted in line x tester fashion. The resulting 45 F1s along with lines and testers were planted in a randomized block design with three replicates during rabi 2004-2005 under normal fertile soil and saline sodic environments at Research Farm of Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad. Each treatment (genotype) was shown in 3 m length having row to row and plant to plant distance of 25 cm and 10 cm, respectively.   The observations were recorded on days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of effective tillers/plant, length of main spike (cm), grains per spike, seed yield/plant (g), 1000 seed weight (g), pelshenke value (minutes), protein content (%), lysine content (%) and husk content (%) on five randomly selected plants from each replication and environments. The combining ability analysis was carried out following the method proposed by (Kempthorne,1957).    

 

Results and Discussion

The analysis of variance for combining ability for eleven characters showed that variances due to gca and sca were significant for the characters like days to maturity, plant height, length of main spike, grains per spike, seed yield per plant, 1000 seed weight, pelshenke value, protein content and husk content under both normal fertile and saline sodic soil conditions, suggesting thereby importance of both additive and non additive gene actions for the inheritance of these characters. The role of both additive and non-additive effects to grain yield and its component characters in barley have been reported previously (Choo et al.,1988; Bhatnagar and Sharma1995;1998). However, the component of variation due to sca was higher than gca for all the characters in all the environments indicating the predominance of non-additive gene action. Such results infers that the chosen material had high selection history. Similar results of predominance of sca variance over gca variance have also been reported by (Guo and Xu,1994; Phogat et al.1995; Madic,1996; El-Seidy,1997a & 1997b; Bouzerzour and Djakoune,1998).

 

A perusal of the gca estimates (Table1) showed that the parents RD-2552, Narendra Jau-4, NDB-1173 in both environments while, Kedar & K-560 in E1, and Lakhan in E2 were the best combiners for seed yield and good/ medium combiner for most of the important yield and quality component characters. Further the parents Ratna, Narendra Jau-1, RD-2552, Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-1 for early maturity, Lakhan, Narendra Jau-1 for dwarf plant height, Azad, RD-2624, NDB-1173 and Ratna for high protein content and Narendra Jau-1, Narendra Jau-2 and Lakhan for high lysine content were found to be good general combiners in both the environments.

 

Significant gca values indicated the importance of additive or additive x additive gene effect as earlier reported by (Griffing,1956). In view of this, these parents offered the best possibilities for the development of improved lines of barley through hybridization programme. It is, therefore, recommended that to improve yield one should breed for superior combining ability for the component traits with an ultimate objective to improve the pace of its genetic improvement.

 

The estimates of specific combining ability effects of top five ranking crosses for all the characters are present in Table 2. The perusal of sca effects revealed that crosses Kedar x K-560, K-603 x K-560, DL-88 x Lakhan RD-2552 x K-560 in normal and RD-2552 x Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan, NDB-1173 x K-560 & RD-2624 x K-560 in saline sodic and RD-2552 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, BL-2 x Lakhan and Jagrati x K-560 under both environments were for seed yield per plant and with other characters. The crosses RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3 and BL-2 x Lakhan are excellent crosses for seed yield in both environments. Therefore, these crosses should be particularly exploited vigorously in future breeding programmes to obtain good segregants which would lead to buildup a population with high genetic yield potential with develop salt tolerant genotypes.   

 

References  

Bhatnagar, V. K., Sharma, S. N. 1995. Diallel analysis for combining ability for grain yield and its components in barley. Indian J. Genet. 55:228-232.

Bhatnagar, V. K., Sharma, S. N. 1998. Diallel analysis for grain yield and harvest index in barley under diverse environments. Rachis. 16:22-27.

Bouzerzour, H., Djakoune, A. 1998. Inheritance of grain yield and grain yield components in barley. Rachis. 16:9-16.

Choo, T. M., Reinbergs, E., Jui, P. Y.1988. Comparison of F2 and F1 diallel analyses in barley. Genome 30:865-869.

El-Seidy, E. S. H.1997a. Inheritance of earliness and yield in some barley crosses. Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor. 35:715-30.

El-Seidy, E. S. H. 1997b. Inheritance of plant height, grain yield and its components in three barley crosses (Hordeum vulgare L.). Ann. Agric. Sci. Moshtohor. 35:63-76.

Guo, Y. Y., Xu, S. Y. 1994. Genetic analysis of yield traits in two-rowed barley. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis 6:156-60.

Griffing, B.1956. Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 9:463-493

Kempthorne, O. 1957. An Introduction to Genetical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons. Inc. New York.

Madic, M. 1996. Inheritance of spike traits and grain yield in barley (H. vulgare L.) hybrids. Rev. Res. Work, Fac. Agric. Belgrade 41:53-65.

Phogat, D. S., Singh,D., Dahiya, G. S., Singh, D. 1995. Genetics of yield and yield components in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Crop Res. Hisar. 9:363-369.

 

 

 

 

      


Table 1. Estimates of general combining ability (gca) effects of parents (lines & testers) for 11 characters in

               barley under normal fertile soil condition (E1) & saline sodic soil condition (E2)

Parents

 

Environ-ments

Days to maturity

Plant

 height

 (cm)

No. of effective tillers /plant

Length of main spike (cm)

Grains/spike

Seed yield/ plant

(g)

1000

 seed weight

(g)

 

Pelshenke value (minute)

Protein

content

(%)

Lysine

content

(%)

Husk

content

(%)

Kedar

E1

0.63**

3.45**

0.40*

-0.18*

-0.71

1.02*

1.10*

6.58**

0.39**

-0.12**

2.30**

E2

1.23**

5.76**

0.26

-0.13

-0.72

0.73

0.99**

5.25**

0.27**

-0.26**

1.35**

K-603

E1

-0.12

-0.62

0.20

-0.26**

-3.08**

-0.45

-1.04*

-1.92*

0.26**

-0.18**

0.13

E2

-1.27**

3.62**

-0.27

-0.60**

-5.51**

-1.58**

-1.67**

-1.67

0.26**

-0.13**

0.44*

DL-88

E1

0.63**

3.85**

-1.02**

-0.63**

-4.14**

-3.04**

-0.74

0.33

-0.21**

0.02

-1.67**

E2

-0.19

3.40**

-0.34

-0.46**

-1.82*

-0.77

-0.86**

0.58

-0.32**

0.07**

-1.23**

RD-2552

E1

-0.62**

-4.96**

0.14

0.04

6.76**

1.19*

-1.11*

-9.92**

-0.68**

0.25**

-1.88**

E2

-0.69**

-2.65**

0.37*

0.11

4.37**

1.83**

-0.83**

-7.58**

-0.52**

0.33**

-1.15**

Azad

E1

2.21**

-6.84**

-0.11

0.17*

4.86**

0.53

0.11

7.16**

2.06**

-0.59**

1.24**

E2

2.56**

0.42

0.08

0.18

5.20**

0.57

0.08

6.17**

1.94**

-0.53**

0.93**

Narendra Jau -1

E1

-0.62**

-2.76**

0.34*

0.32**

-0.54

0.54

0.55

-0.34

-1.38**

0.56**

-0.23

E2

-0.52*

-4.57**

0.29

0.19

1.50

0.71

0.67**

0.42

-0.49**

0.59**

-0.60**

Narendra Jau -2

E1

-1.54**

3.59**

0.08

0.80**

1.23

0.48

0.28

-3.42**

-1.68**

0.51**

1.50**

E2

0.06

-4.55**

0.33

0.49**

0.34

0.46

0.14

-3.25**

-1.77**

0.52**

1.44**

Narendra Jau -4

E1

0.29

-2.66**

1.31**

0.65**

4.73**

3.54**

-0.32

-6.76**

-1.01**

0.34**

0.35

E2

1.14**

2.68**

0.50**

0.50**

1.78

0.90*

-0.29

-6.83**

-1.05**

0.10**

0.69**

NDB-1173

E1

-2.71**

-1.98**

-0.11

0.71**

6.99**

2.14**

1.75**

-1.76*

0.93**

-0.28**

-1.99**

E2

-2.11**

-4.08**

0.00

0.52**

6.08**

1.24**

2.09**

-1.67

0.99**

-0.32**

-1.98**

RD-2035

E1

0.13

0.22

-0.21

-0.23*

4.15**

0.66

-0.99*

-2.34**

-0.35**

0.11**

1.05**

E2

-0.36

-1.69**

0.09

-0.15

3.43**

0.02

-0.94**

-2.08*

-0.46**

0.12**

0.98**

RD-2624

E1

0.71**

-3.44**

-0.45**

-0.38**

-9.32**

-3.52**

-1.60**

0.08

1.63**

-0.40**

-0.63**

E2

-0.19

-0.77

-0.60**

-0.05

-3.70**

-2.36**

-1.47**

0.33

1.54**

-0.35**

-0.40

BL-2

E1

1.54**

1.89**

0.43*

-0.13

-2.49*

0.63

0.29

3.24**

-0.09*

-0.03

-1.33**

E2

0.23

-2.29**

0.36*

-0.08

-3.35**

0.66

0.03

3.33**

-0.18**

-0.04**

-1.35**

Jagrati

E1

1.13**

4.50**

-0.26

-0.32**

-4.47**

-1.22**

1.20**

1.24

-0.30**

0.15**

0.93**

E2

1.39**

-2.44**

-0.45*

-0.21

-3.45**

-0.98*

1.12**

1.58

-0.47**

0.18**

0.69**

BH-512

E1

-0.12

7.09**

-0.31

-0.36**

1.19

-0.74

0.03

0.99

0.02

-0.05

2.49**

E2

0.31

4.29**

-0.18

-0.35*

0.12

-0.41

0.12

-0.33

-0.07**

-0.03*

2.14**

Ratna

E1

-1.54**

-1.34*

-0.44**

-0.21*

-5.17**

-1.75**

0.49

6.83**

0.41**

-0.29**

-2.26**

E2

-1.61**

2.87**

-0.45*

0.04

-4.27**

-1.04*

0.83**

5.75**

0.33**

-0.25**

-1.94**

SE (gi) lines

E1

0.22

0.64

0.17

0.09

0.97

0.45

0.45

0.75

0.04

0.03

0.21

E2

0.22

0.52

0.17

0.13

0.93

0.45

0.21

0.88

0.03

0.01

0.20

SE(gi-gj) lines

E1

0.31

0.90

0.23

0.13

1.37

0.64

0.64

1.05

0.06

0.04

0.30

E2

0.31

0.74

0.25

0.19

1.31

0.64

0.30

1.24

0.04

0.02

0.29

K-560

E1

0.88**

1.83**

0.27**

0.18**

0.68

0.76**

0.19

-5.77**

0.18**

-0.04**

-1.20**

E2

1.31**

-0.87**

0.07

0.05

0.41

0.41

-0.22*

-5.17**

0.14**

-0.06**

-0.87**

Narendra Jau-3

E1

-0.81**

2.69**

0.31**

0.09

-0.18

0.21

0.24

1.94**

0.07**

-0.06**

0.17

E2

-0.36**

0.59*

-0.04

0.08

0.48

-0.02

0.17

1.97**

0.34**

-0.11**

-0.12

Lakhan

E1

0.10

-6.63**

-0.90**

-0.16**

0.79

-1.11**

-0.42

2.30**

-0.44**

0.22**

1.37**

E2

0.02

-0.70*

0.17

-0.05

0.09

0.78**

0.15

2.06**

-0.60**

0.26**

1.40**

SE (gi) testers

E1

0.11

0.33

0.09

0.05

0.5

0.23

0.23

0.39

0.02

0.02

0.11

E2

0.11

0.27

0.09

0.07

0.48

0.23

0.11

0.45

0.01

0.01

0.10

SE(gi-gj) testers

E1

0.16

0.46

0.12

0.06

0.71

0.33

0.33

0.54

0.03

0.02

0.15

E2

0.16

0.38

0.13

0.10

0.68

0.33

0.15

0.64

0.02

0.01

0.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Significant at 5% probability level, ** Significant at 1% probability level

 

 

Table 2. Promising crosses for seed yield and quality component in barley under normal    

              fertile soil and saline sodic soil condition.

 

Characters

Normal fertile soil  environment

Saline sodic soil environment

 

Days to maturity

Kedar x Lakhan, RD-2552 x K-560, RD-2552 x Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, RD-2624 x Lakhan

K-603 x K-560, RD-2624 x Lakhan, Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, Kedar x Lakhan, Jagrati x Narendra Jau-3

 

Plant height (cm)

Jagrati x Lakhan, BL-2 x Lakhan, Narendra Jau-2 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x Lakhan, Kedar x Narendra Jau-3

Ratna x Narendra Jau-4, BL-2 x Lakhan, DL-88 x K-560, RD-2035 x Lakhan, RD-2624 x Lakhan

 

Number of effective

tillers/plant

RD-2035 x K-560, BL-2 x Narendra Jau-3,

Jagrati x K-560, BL-2 x Lakhan

Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan, NDB-1173 x K-560, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3

 

Length of main spike (cm)

K-603 x K560, K-603 x Narendra Jau-3, DL-88 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x K-560,Jagrati x K-560

DL-88 x Lakhan, NDB-1173 x Lakhan,

RD-2035 x Lakhan

 

Grains/spike

BL-2 x Lakhan, Kedar x K-560, K-603 x K-560, DL-88 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x Lakhan

BL-2 x Lakhan, RD-2624 x K-560, DL-88 x Lakhan, Narendra Jau-4 x Narendra Jau-3, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3

 

Seed yield per plant (g)

BL-2 x Lakhan, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, Jagrati x K-560, RD-2552 x Lakhan, Kedar x K-560

Narendra Jau-1 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan, NDB-1173 x K560, RD-2053 x Narendra Jau-3, BL-2 x Lakhan

 

1000-seed

 weight (g)

BL-2 x Lakhan, Jagrati x K-560,

RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan,

 

BL-2 x Lakhan, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan RD-2552 x Narendra Jau-3, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, Jagrati x Narendra Jau-3

Pelshenke

 value (minute)

Narendra Jau- 1 x K-560, RD-2552 x K-560, RD-2624 x Lakhan, Narendra Jau- 4 x K-560, BL-2 x Narendra Jau-3

RD-2552 x K-560, Narendra Jau- 4 x Lakhan, RD-2552 x Narendra Jau-3, RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, Jagrati x Narendra Jau-3

 

Protein

 content (%)

RD-2552 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x K-560, Kedar x Narendra Jau-3, BH-512 x Lakhan, Ratna x K-560

Narendra Jau-4 x K-560, RD-2552 x K-560, K-603 x Narendra Jau-3, NDB-1173 x K-560, Kedar x Narendra Jau-3

 

Lysine

 content (%)

DL-88 x K-560, Kedar x K-560, K-603 x K-560,

RD-2035 x Narendra Jau-3, RD-2552 x Lakhan

K-603 x K-560, DL-88 x K-560, Narendra Jau-4 x Lakhan, Kedar x Lakhan, Narendra Jau-4 x Narendra Jau-3

 

Husk

 content (%)

Narendra Jau-2 x Narendra Jau-3, Kedar x Narendra Jau-3, K-603 x K-560, Azad x K-560, DL-88 x K-560

Narendra Jau-2 x Narendra Jau-3, Kedar x Narendra Jau-3, Narendra Jau-4 x Narendra Jau-3, K-603 x K-560,

DL-88 x K-560